Tuesday, October 20, 2015

A strangely shallow ecumenism

It is lonely being a member of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod.  We are not in altar and pulpit fellowship with many groups in a world in which fellowship has become like Facebook friendship and the goal is to accumulate as many friends as possible.  There are not a few within and without of Missouri who delight in making jokes about the small circle of formal altar and pulpit fellowship which encompasses Missouri and her friends.  Sometimes that includes me.  We once kidded each other by saying Missouri was the true, visible sect on earth.  It was the kind of humor that masked a wound but did not ease its pain.

That said, I have learned that there is another kind of loneliness which is even more a problem.  It is the loneliness of those so unsure of their faith or so casual about their convictions that diversity and difference -- even conflict and outright disagreement -- are no bar to claiming the friendship of altar and pulpit.  This kind of ecumenism is born of basic insecurity and uncertainty.  Those who are unsure about what, if anything, can truly be known or believed are more likely to find answer and solace in the company of as many individuals are in the same boat as they are.

What we face today is what Mascall and Boyer have called Alice in Wonderland ecumenism.  In this kind of ecumenical friendship, the more the merrier and doctrine is discarded or forgotten in order to foster such formal declarations of unity that often have little to do with truth.  In this kind of ecumenism, everyone agrees (even to disagree), everyone is a winner, and everyone gets a prize.  It is like the county fair in which the concessions always promise a prize whether you win or lose. 

In truth, real ecumenism always begins with disagreement and even conflict.  Unless we admit what divides us, we have no hope of uniting us.  That includes a serious appraisal of what it is we believe, confess, and teach -- and whether it is Biblical, catholic, and faithful.  The only path to real agreement begins when each group lays their convictions and confessions under the microscope of what Scripture says, what the Church has always believed and confessed, and how faithfully this group believes and confesses it now.

Real ecumenism always has winners and losers.  We cannot all disagree and be correct.  This is the modern fallacy of truth -- nobody is wrong.  But of course some are wrong.  The game here is not won in who is right and who is wrong but who is faithful to the Word, to the catholic tradition, and to expressing it fully today.  The shame is not in being wrong but refusing to reject the wrong in the face of what Scripture says and catholic tradition upholds.  Real ecumenism will always have winners and losers but those who lose win when they correct their confession and reject the wrong.  We all do.

Real ecumenism gives out no prizes.  It is not a game at all.  It is the pursuit of faithfulness to the Word of the Lord and the catholic principle -- this is its own reward.  We are not in it to pad the friendship count or to demonstrate we are better than anyone else but to make sure that we are faithful to Christ and His Word and faithful to the catholic tradition of what has always and everywhere been confessed from that Word. 

So it is lonely at times being a member of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod.  But it is not as lonely as it is when fellowship is an participial creation of desire absent truth, creed, confession, and catholicity.  Yes, we have our problems in Missouri.  We surely do.  And we cannot afford to overlook our own problems in order to concern ourselves with the problems of others.  But neither can we afford to compound those problems by seeking such an Alice in Wonderland church in which truth is true for the moment, when faith is flexible, when doctrine lives within a diversity in which no one is correct, and the Word of the Lord merely suggests rather than defines us. 

I long for the day when altars and pulpits are fully open, when we are strengthened by the convictions of others who speak with us in one voice, and when we harbor no errors of will and intent... but those whose hearts ache for the unity of the Church will find no relief for their pain in ignoring, overlooking or minimizing the serious theological differences that divide us.  If we will not have it on earth to satisfy our desire, then let us be content with the promise of Christ that His Church is one and that He knows His own.  Until then let us just make sure that we know the Shepherd rightly and trust that He who is Lord of the Church will bring all things to pass in the fullness of time.

3 comments:

Carl Vehse said...

"So it is lonely at times being a member of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod."

Currently the Missiouri Synod is in altar and pulpit fellowship with 36 partner church bodies around the world. And along with 34 other church bodies, the Missouri Synod also belongs to the International Lutheran Council (ILC), with the Missouri Synod's Director of Church Relations Rev. Dr. Albert Collver III as ILC’s executive secretary. However, the member church bodies of the ILC are not required to be in A&P fellowship with each other. Also the ILC is distinguished from other pan-Lutheran organizations, the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) and the Confessional Evangelical Lutheran Conference (CELC).

Recently the ILC expanded to 38 members by admitting three new member church bodies:

The Siberian Evangelical Lutheran Church (SELC), with 2,100 baptized members in 25 congregations and 19 clergy (1 bishop, 14 pastors and 4 deacons).
The Lutheran Church Synod of Nicaragua (ILSN), with 1,800 baptized members, 23 congregations (plus missions in Honduras and Costa Rica), 26 pastors and 37 deaconesses.
The Lutheran Church in Norway (LKN), with 50 baptized members, one congregation, eight preaching points and three pastors (plus one retired pastor).

Padre Dave Poedel said...

The vision of ecumenism presented here is certainly the ideal, and is an ecumenism of integrity. True ecumenism involves at least 2 partners who agree to study their own and each other's theology, doctrine and practice and subject it to the view of the other.

My question for the audience who reads this and who knows the history of the LCMS better than I do: Can you give me an example of a circumstance, doctrine or practice that, when subjected to ecumenical examination with a partner church, was declared to be in error and changed for the sake of the relationship between the partner churches?

I'd like to propose a potential area for ecumenical examination and a realization that the Lutheran view may not be in the best interest of the Church: our singular view of the Pastoral Office. The entire Christian Church, both East and West, had declared the major Orders of Deacon, Priest/Pastor and Bishop. I know our doctrine well so I am not asking to be convinced of the correctness of our doctrine. What I am asking is: in the hypothetical ecimenical discussion with a Church in the Catholic Tradition and the only "sticking point" was the singular versus the three-fold Office. What can the LCMS "give" to arrive at an agreement that has theological integrity?

If the answer is "nothing", I declare that we are officially sectarian.

Carl Vehse said...

”True ecumenism involves at least 2 partners who agree to study their own and each other's theology, doctrine and practice and subject it to the view of the other.”

This notion about “true ecumenism” conflicts with the understanding included in “A Lutheran Stance Toward Ecumenism” (CTCR, 1974):

“Lutheran ecumenism addresses itself in the spirit of the Augsburg Confession in order to bring about Christian concord.”

“The concord that Lutherans desire and seek is confessional agreement among all Christians that extends to all the articles of faith revealed in the Sacred Scriptures and comprised in the Lutheran Symbols.”

Because the two asked questions are based on the erroneous notion, the subsequent claim—If the answer is "nothing", I declare that we are officially sectarian—would be a Lufauxran, not a Lutheran, declaration. Furthermore, the burden of proof is on such a declarer to show an example of a circumstance, doctrine or practice that, when subjected to ecumenical examination with an ecumenical partner church, was declared by the Missouri Synod on the basis of Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions to be in error, yet was NOT changed.

”I know our doctrine well so I am not asking to be convinced of the correctness of our doctrine.”

Because convincing is not being asked for, the conceded correctness of our doctrine (including its practice) itself, is the reason NOT to give in to the only “sticking point” in a hypothetical ecumenical discussion, especially with the Romish and Eastern religious bodies.