Friday, April 28, 2017

Unique learning styles. . .

While nearly 90 percent of Americans think people have unique learning styles — the best known are labeled auditory, visual, and kinesthetic — cognitive research has steadily debunked the idea over time. To mark Brain Awareness Week this month, 30 internationally respected neuroscientists, psychologists, and educators issued a public letter asking teachers to stop wasting time with it.  For more, read here. . .

So for how many years we have been told that the problem was the teacher and the classroom not conforming to the diversity of learning styles within the students of that classroom?  It sounded good.  It seemed to explain why some learn and others do not progress.  It seemed to justify the huge sums of money Americans spend on education (tracing down every fad and trend).  The one thing it has not done is help our children learn.



We regularly re-invent education, denouncing the past efforts as crude or uniformed, and send our teachers to expensive training sessions that promise everything but deliver little but an expensive bill that steals our attention and our money away from the tried and true methods that work.  Worse than merely spending our money and distracting our teachers, these myths give our students an excuse for not working hard and for giving up because their instructional model does not fit their learning style.  In her book Mindset, Carol Dweck notes that when people have a “fixed mindset” about their abilities, seeing failure as a signal to stop rather than work harder, they are less likely to achieve regardless of their innate abilities. Thus pegging a child as an “auditory learner” can teach him to give up or not try when he receives information another way, ultimately reducing his learning. It gives him an excuse to not do the work to learn.

Perhaps one of the reasons parochial schools and other similar institutions work is that they have no money to spend on the newest and latest theories of learning and typically stick with the older and, it turns our, more proven methods.

2 comments:

  1. As a teacher, I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment about education. Unfortunately, I see many parallels between what is going on in many public schools and what is going on in many churches. Much of the "innovation" that is being foisted on schools and churches has more to do with self-promotion and making money than in promoting student learning and understanding or increasing our faith and trust in Christ.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have said this for years, but I can't tell you how much flak I have gotten over this issue. For 17 years, I was an engineering professor at several different colleges, and I had a very definite teaching style. I got lots of good results, and many favorable comments. I also had some who failed to learn and complained. The essence of the complaints was usually that they did not find my teaching style suited to their individual preferences.

    It is very refreshing to see someone in authority actually say what I have known all along. If the information is well presented, it can be learned by all, and that "learning styles" is so much rot.

    Fr. D+

    ReplyDelete