Some have suggested that this is less about babies than about trying to control a woman's body. There is no denying that every law that protects the vulnerable from the whims of the strong is an attempt to control or restrain those who would without a second thought end a life to make their life easier. But what is too often forgotten is that the control that abortion seeks to put in place is a control that both the woman and the man overrode in order to succumb to their desires. Desire cannot be the basis of law or right or we are all at risk. None of us is so strong that we could not or would not be victims of those more powerful than we are.
Some have said that if we put as much effort into aiding the mother in her often solitary responsibility for the child conceived outside of marriage as we have fighting Roe, we might not need an abortion law at all. How foolish. Would anyone presume that the pregnancy centers all around that do offer counseling, material, and emotional support to the mother considering a way out of her pregnancy all receive government support? Of course, the same churches and church members who march for life are the ones who pull out their wallets to make sure that this is not simply about a baby but a life, from beginning to end, acknowledged as sacred and a gift from God and supported into eternal life. At one point in time churches covered every aspect of a child born outside of marriage -- not without error or evil to be sure -- but today the government has made it impossible to maintain the honest confession and abide by the rules set down from on high.
My own parish expects to send in excess of $5,000 to our local Pregnancy Center -- and this for one fundraising effort. Our people volunteer there and we support a whole host of parachurch aid and relief organizations to make sure tit is not simply a vocal but shallow support of those who have no place to turn. And we will continue to be there working, by the grace of God, to deal with the need as well as the outcome of our attention to the sacred task of caring for all life in our Savior's name.
June 24th should be celebrated annually as Emancipation Day for Children of the Womb. Unborn children will still be murdered in some states, but not under the pretence of a mother's "right of abortion."
ReplyDeleteJustice Day for the 65+ million butchered children of the womb will have to wait, at the earliest, until at least one abortion leader, enabler or provider is tried, convicted, and sentenced for genocide, crimes against humanity, and treason.
In the meantime there is a Schadenfreude in realizing that it was the Jackson Women's Health Organization (and baby slaughterhouse), along with their Center for Reproductive Rights [sic] lawyers who originally filed suit in April, 2018, against Mississippi's pro-life laws. This was before Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett were appointed to the Supreme Court, which, on May 17, 2021, granted Mississippi Department of Health Officer Thomas Dobbs' petition for certiorari on a lower court decision in the case.
"Each state will now decide and different states will decide differently"
ReplyDeleteWith a Republican majority (not including traitorous RINOcrats) in Congress and a sentient Republican president, a federal law could be passed defining that a human person begins at conception. Thus any state allowing elective abortion of an unborn child would violate that child's 14th amendment right to life.