Thursday, October 31, 2024

Don't blame the Reformation. . .

As we pause to remember the Reformation, we cannot do so without also confronting some of the myths about that Reformation.  Chief among them is the whole idea that Lutherans are Protestants.  While there was a brief period in which that term could have applied to Lutherans, no Lutheran should feel comfortable under that banner today.  Part of this discomfort lies in the way the autonomous individual has become the hallmark of Protestant thinking and identity and how this has been absorbed by politics and social and individual thinking outside religion.

One of the sad byproducts of the Reformation was succumbing to the temptation to define humanity by the intellect and the will and to presume that the Gospel was primarily motivation or inspiration needed so that people could understand themselves and the world in which they live and make better choices (especially when it comes to behavior).  Perhaps the die was cast when Erasmus issued forth upon the freedom of the will and Luther responded with the bondage of the same.  In any case, religious information has become the sacrament of conversion and improvement in human behavior.  The world around us has certainly jumped on that band wagon though with sad results. 

The reduction of life to information and choice is a corruption of the Scriptures and of catholic tradition but it is also a destructive foundation that cannot and will not support our lives as individuals or our lives together as a family, community, and nation.  Upon emigrating to America, C. F. W. Walther once complained that American churches had become lecture halls and worship and faith all about information and morality.  He saw Lutheranism as anything but this kind of church or theology.  But the criticism is easier than mending the whole idea that it all boils down to matters of intellect or will.

You have seen how quickly this idea has spread.  The volumes written to systematize and organize Christian theology have resulted in one that is certainly less Biblical but it is also not authentic nor does it bear witness to the Word made flesh.  Most of these volumes are an attempt not to teach what Scripture says but to impart understanding and knowledge that is largely an appeal to the mind and the rationale for this is to improve decision making.  Gone is any real sense of beauty or mystery and present in worship as well as theology is the decision to make things black and white.  Even where this is absent today, the spirituality is without foundation in Scripture except for an occasional proof text that functions like the meme in social media to illustrate rather than encounter the living voice of God.

Those who design churches have taken this to heart, emphasizing the horizontal over the vertical and turning altars into tables whose scale and position are not allowed to detract from the pulpit.  Even the modern churches with their Lucite podiums want people to know that the one speaking is the center of attention.  The sacraments are also rans in the whole idea of how we go to God and absent from it all is the very idea that God has come to us.  Success in churches is measured not by fidelity but by numbers and especially by likes and consumer ratings.  Christianity then quickly morphed into a media of religious morality (information+decision) with the only real debate as to which morality is better than others.  The poverty of Protestantism is that there is no Biblical ethic that cannot and will not be surrendered to the supremacy of the individual and no judgment valued except happiness and self-fulfillment and self-expression. This is now so commonplace that many conservative Christians and Lutherans are surprised that this is not how it has always been.

Christians became consumers and worshipers became an audience and truth became whatever you would summarize or consolidate in a few clear words.  It is no wonder that Biblical illiteracy is greater now than ever.  We do not want to hear God's voice.  We want to hear our own.  It is here that the Lutheran Reformation lives.  Luther was not appealing to an individual conscience but the common conscience of God's revealed truth.  His interest in education was tied to his desire to see people hear in Scripture the voice of God acting and doing what He has said.  The Church in Luther was not some community of like minded thinkers but the place where the Word spoke, a voice absolved, water gave new birth, and bread and wine tasted of the body and blood of Jesus.  The driving force here was not the individual or information or a choice but the Spirit calling, gathering, enlightening, and sanctifying.  This is a profoundly mystical understanding of what for most has become a decidedly banal and ordinary definition of and character to the Church. 

On this Reformation Day it would be good for us to remember that what Protestantism has become is an even greater danger to the Christian faith and life than the errors and abuses of medieval Roman Catholicism.  When he rode into town like a knight to restrain the extremists who thought they knew him, Luther did not but maybe should have foreseen what this would look like down the road.  If he had, he might have had a chance to make it clearer that this was not the Reformation he had envisioned.  In any case, the worst of Lutheranism and the whole of Protestantism have little to do with Luther and the Great Reformation and everything to do with the pursuit of ideas that cannot be supported by Scripture or found in the catholic tradition.  Until we learn this, the celebration of Reformation Day might be best surrendered to the forces of Halloween.  As the Reformation was in search of an anchor stronger than popes or councils, today it is in search of an anchor stronger than the preferences and desires of the individual.  Because of that I literally wince when someone defines Lutherans as Protestants.

Wednesday, October 30, 2024

Don't Google It. . .

One of the byproducts of our digital age so fixated on technology is that we have become dependent upon this resource and cannot function without it.  Math has become less the answer to the problem or even the formula to get it but the tool that gives us the answer without bothering for us to think at all.  We trust the digital tools in part because we do not know any better.  We do not know if the calculator is correct or not because we have nothing to compare its answer to.  The same is true for a host of facts and information memorized in the past but now we rely on Google and soon AI.  Technology has gotten smarter but we have become more ignorant in the process.  We have all watched someone at a register paralyzed when we changed the cash we gave them after he had already punched it into the machine and been told what change to give.  There was a day, believe it or not, when a good mechanic could diagnose what was wrong with your vehicle by listening to it.  Now a computer will tell him what to do and he has become the technician instead of the master.  The same is true of medicine where technology wins out over experience, intuition, and education everyday (not to mention the arcane rules of payment!).

Are we better for it?  Some say yes.  The self scanner at the supermarket is better than a real person, right?  The AI chat or phone queue is better than a real person, right?  Is it better for us to know where to go for our information rather than to know it ourselves?  Is it better for us to cede to technology what we once knew and could do for ourselves?  The mighty Musk tells us we will all be better off when AI takes over our jobs and lives and we do nothing.  Will we be better ff?  When the day comes and I hang up my hat I will walk out the door with 32 years of institutional memory.  People think I am concerned about giving up power or control but I seem to be almost alone in worrying about the loss of this institutional memory.  Just Google it, right?  When my wife retired at the height of her knowledge and expertise as a nurse, her employer saw her as a budget line.  Is that all she was?

Sadly this whole thing has had a profound effect upon the Church.  Our people do not know Scripture, do not memorize the Catechism, do not know their hymns, do not recall great prayers or collects, and do not seem to think this is a problem.  We live in a Google age in which we do not need to know anymore than where to go.  AI pastors already dispense spiritual counsel over the internet.  Why bother with flesh and blood?  The lesson of Covid to some is that we do not need the Church or to be in worship or to have a pastor.  We have the world wide web.  Is this advancing the cause of Christ in the home or in the Church or in the world?  Does it glorify God that we know Him more by caricature than His Word?  More by what we imagine Him to be than what He has said?  Does this have consequences for us as people and as a Church?  We live in an age of Biblical illiteracy which affects us more than we know and not for our good.  Without our knowledge of His Word and our ability to discern truth from error based on that Word we are now more than ever vulnerable to that error, to the devil's taunts, to the world's temptations, and to our own weaknesses.

 

Tuesday, October 29, 2024

The word sin taught us. . .

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder -- or so sin has taught us.  We do not know what beauty is.  We must be taught and it must be revealed to us.  That does not keep us from thinking we know what beauty is and, more importantly, how to distinguish it from its opposite.  How arrogant we are!

The Lord created all things in beauty.  He was not shy in telling us this.  After calling from nothing the something of His creation He did not shrink from telling us it was good.  In fact, even the foreknowledge of what we would do with His creation and with our selves did not keep Him from glowing over the man He had made.  He was very good!  All of that came to a crashing halt when our first parents chose their way over His way and sought to become an equal to their Creator.  Then what we had only known as beauty was challenged by and a shadow cast over it by ugliness.  Sin is the source of ugliness but we have trouble convincing ourselves that such is the case.

Sex which was created in beauty became ugly with lust driving it instead of love and pleasure its object instead of a child.  We took what God had made so wonderfully and made it into something that shamed Adam and Eve even without the benefit of internet porn or a hook up culture or consensual desires that have no bounds but what you choose.   The shape of gender which obviously reflected man's need for woman and her need for him was too beautiful to be left without challenge and we took this holy order and rent it asunder with divorce and adultery and genders invented to glorify the power of desire most of all.  Creation itself was raped and pillaged until mountains collapsed under the might of our power and valleys rose up just because we were sure we could do better.  Life was built with a purpose for work that helped to define us as well as provide for us until we decided work was evil and leisure was good.  Now the most prized inventions of our technology are those that replace work and allow us the freedom and resources to pursue our childish desires with reckless abandon.  We have taken what God created in holiness and beauty and turned it into something cheap and ugly that even disappoints us.

The most grievous sin of entertainment worship and the churches which are temples of "me" is not that it all offends God but it perpetuates the image of ugliness that we mistake for beauty and good.  The worst consequence of our libertine sexuality and our application of choice to gender is not what it does to morality but what this immorality does to us.  It makes cheap what God has valued with the priceless blood of His Son and it makes common His nobility placed on us in His image.  What were once facts are not ideas or preferences.  What was once clear through our vision of God has become muddied and opaque under the guise of freedom and a culture of rights.  When we as the Church ceased to look to the Word of God to find rescue and release, we did not stop looking.  Instead we looked past God and into the mirror of ourselves, our wants, and our desires.  We drank so deeply from this poison in our glass that we ended up blind and broken -- something obvious to everyone but ourselves!  Seeing we did not see anymore as beauty gave way to ugliness. Sin took so much from us and the only thing sin left to us was our strong will to be who we want and to do what feels good now.

The liturgy beckons as the voice of God to surrender the ugliness of sin and its desire and begin to learn beauty.  The house of God dare not be like the living rooms in which we plan and carry out our sinful desires.  It must be something holy and sacred --- not simply because of its noble function and purpose but because beauty is God's gift and blessing.  Where Christ is, there is the challenge to all the ugliness we can invent and only where Christ is their hope beyond the mess we cannot clean up.  Churches would do well to think in terms of beauty -- beauty which contrasts with the bare walls that have become mere screens to the gods of technology where we film ourselves because we love that subject best of all.  This beauty is not for the sake itself but for the sake of us for whom our beautiful Savior came. 

Monday, October 28, 2024

Slogans are not faith. . .

Sermon for Reformation Day Observed, preached on Sunday, October 27, 2024.

Slogans are great for advertising.  Everyone of us knows that America runs on Dunkin or Eat More Chikin or We have the meats or I’m loving it or better ingredients, better pizza.  But a slogan cannot make up for what is missing – good food.  Slogans can pique your curiosity and bring you in the door once but they cannot keep you coming back.  The same is true for church slogans.  A slogan cannot replace the truth.

We Lutherans are good at slogans.  We have the solas – sola Scriptura, sola gratia, sola fidei.  We have Law and Gospel.  We have Word and Sacrament.  We have means of grace.  We were once known as the Church of the Lutheran Hour.  But slogans cannot make up for unfaithful doctrine or unfocused preaching or music that feels good but says nothing of Christ and His work.  In order to have a reason for coming back, we need something more than a catchy slogan.  We need the truth that endures forever.

In the Gospel today is a phrase that has become a slogan.  The truth will set you free.  We all know how that slogan has been used and misused by every group or cause looking for a snappy phrase.  Jesus does not give us a slogan.  We should not be content with a slogan. Jesus gives us Himself and we should not be content with anything less.  His words are truth you can take to the bank.

St. John says that Jesus spoke these words to the Jews who had believed in Him.  These were not Christians who had believed but had stopped believing.  Nor were they Christians who believed so profoundly that they had no doubts or fears or worries any longer.  These were a people who believed but whose faith was constantly challenged, whose hearts were troubled by things that did not seem right, whose minds were anxious over things that did not make sense.  Their faith was young and therefore their faith was in danger.  Jesus does not speak to condemn them or even to tell them not to worry.  Jesus loves them and He addresses them so that their faith might be strong, they might be strengthened in Him, and brought by His grace to everlasting life.

Jesus is not talking to an arrogant crowd of people who denied the obvious.  He is not talking to people who reject the truth for the lie of their history as they remembered it.  It is not about if they had ever been slaves or not or who were the legitimate sons of Abraham.  It was about people just like you and me who live for the high moments when faith seems easy and life in Christ a snap.  People like you and me who dread the valleys of the shadow and the struggles that make Christian life hard.  Jesus is warning them and warning us.  You will fall away unless you remain rooted and planted in Him.  Only those who abide in Him and in His Word will remain His disciples.  The rest will wither and die and fall away at the first sign of trouble.

Faith is hard enough in Christ.  Apart from Christ it is impossible.  This is as true today as when Christ addressed a crowd that had become disillusioned by all His talk of the cross and His description of their lives of faith bearing their cross and following Him.  It is the same as when Luther woke up to find the Church had remembered everything except the truth of sins forgiven, life restored, and salvation freely bestowed in Christ.  It is the same as when you turn on the news or get the bad news from the doctor or struggle to make the financial ends meet or keep your marriage and family together.  Bette Davis once said that old age is not for sissies.  Faith is not for sissies either.  It is hard and we endure not because we are strong or mighty or right – no we endure only because we abide in Christ.

We have two temptations.  Either we think we are mighty oaks who will always survive the storms of life or we fear we are little saplings vulnerable to the slightest breeze. We are neither.  We are the planting of the Lord and He has promised that we will endure.  But we will only endure as long as we are rooted and planted in Christ and His Word.  We are not as weak as we think for in Christ we are the strongest of the strong – not even death can steal from us the life our Lord has planed in us by baptism.  Nor are we strong apart from Christ.  Faith without anchor in Christ and the nourishment of His Word and Sacraments will die.  Faith in Christ is anchored in the eternal love that once in time suffered and die for our salvation and His refreshment turns the weak into the mighty.

Everything depends upon Christ and His Word.  Slogans will not save us, nor will bravado.  Our enemies cannot steal us from His grasp nor keep from us the gifts of God appointed for us in Christ -- so as long as we abide in Him and in His Word.  Our kinship with Abraham is not a matter of DNA but of faith – faith that trusted in aged bodies to give birth to the son of promise.  Faith is what saves us -- faith in Christ alone.  In order for faith to live in us, the Word and Spirit must give it birth.  In order for faith to endure, we need to be connected to Christ through His Word and Sacraments, living close to Him where He is.

These are good words for youth ready to confess their faith and make an adult sized promise to remain in this faith and church as long as they live.  These are good words for Lutherans tempted to make a deity out of their heritage instead of heeding the example of the faithful in trusting Christ alone.  These are good words for a people who believe but who find believing hard and the Christian life an obstacle course.  Abide in Christ.  That is no slogan.  That is the font that washes clean the sinner, the absolution that lifts sin's burden of guilt and shame, the Gospel Word that speaks the Good Shepherd's voice, and the altar that feeds the sinner upon Christ’s flesh and blood.

God is warning us.  It is possible to fall away, to lose your way, and to substitute the legacy of a past for the living hope of the present.  If we live by slogans we shall surely die by them.  But if we are anchored in Christ through His Word, we shall abide in Him to everlasting life.

The Reformation insisted that the cross where Christ paid the price of our redemption could not be just one of the many things we believe and confess, it is THE thing on which the Church and every Christian stands or falls.  The reformers were calling us and every Christian to dig deep into the soil of God’s Word or risk being plucked from the faithful by the cares and distractions of this mortal life.  When we insist to those being confirmed today that they must worship and read God’s Word and commune we are not putting a rule upon their shoulders but teaching them how they will abide in Christ and where Christ has made Himself accessible and available to them and for them.  When we come with our faith in tatters because it is hard to be faithful in a faithless world, the Lord points us to the victory won upon the cross, sets us free from the prison of our worries and fears, and walks us to everlasting life.

Faith is not decision made once but daily and weekly living near the Word of God and nourished by the body and blood of Jesus from this altar.  It is nothing to know Jesus for a moment unless that knowledge endures and leads to everlasting life.  For this to happen, we need to abide in Christ.  Our call to God to save us is also a call to be daily and weekly kept by the power of His Word preached and the power of His body and blood to impart eternal life to us.  The Church, baptism, and faith are not accidents but God at work deliberately clothing us with Christ so that we may be in Christ and be kept in Christ to life eversting.  Intentions and slogans will always fail us but Christ will not.  Abide in Christ and you will endure as His children forevermore.  That is the message once spoken to Jews who believed in Jesus and that is the Gospel we hear today.  Those who abide in Christ shall live forever.  Amen

Leave me alone. . .

There seems to be a rather profound political division in America between those who think the government and our leaders are doing too much and those who think they are not doing enough.  It is a rather classic controversy between those who want to be left alone and those who insist upon being being noticed.  I am not sure how it falls along party line but I think it is pretty obvious that the folks who do not want an interventionist government are more on the Republican and Trump side than Democrat and Harris side.  Although it is a great divide of distrust, it is also a philosophical difference.

We all have people we do not trust in America.  As is rather obvious, I do not trust the experts whose expertise is driven by ideology nor do I trust the educational elite or the media elite or the entertainment elite or the big pharma/corporate medicine cartel.  Although I have not trusted them for a long time, after the pandemic I trust them even less.  I do not understand how thinking people could be corralled so easily by their fears to believe in masks, social distancing, or a vaccine that does not quite prevent what it was invented to prevent.  I do not impose my choices on others in this regard and you are perfectly free to disagree with me, thank God!  But I do not want to have the choices of others imposed upon me either.  And I refuse to grant that because someone makes gazillions in Hollywood or reads the news from a teleprompter or confuses ideology with education that person has a better opinion than mine.  Taylor Swift is free to vote for whom she chooses but we are all fools if we are influenced by her choice.  The same is true on every side for every political color or candidate.  Truth should not be red or blue.

Others do not trust industries or corporations, real estate tycoons or those who wear the uniform of a soldier or police, or those who hold to values we all once held a generation or so ago.  I get it.  The old establishment of politics, government, the ruling class, and such have let you down.  You do not understand why we would not use force to accomplish the good the people are not choosing for themselves.  For you society is not changing fast enough and you have had it up to your eyeballs with those who put a monkey wrench in the work of transforming America by executive order and governmental rules.  You are free to have your opinion.  But again, truth should not be red or blue.  Without truth in common, we are only our divisions and without a moral compass shared we are all over the page in our recognition of what ought to be done in the name of America.

What I do say is this.  America was founded as a place where the government was not our conscience or our God, where a minimal government was preferred over one that constrained too much of our freedom, and as a place where we all have a right to be left alone as long as we are not directly harming someone else.  I think the truth is that those on both sides are voting more against each other than for the standard bearer of their cause.  Harris may not be the spawn of Satan but neither is she the Messiah.  Trump may be an egotistic sleazeball but he is not the end of the world.  One candidate has made it clear that Christians may not be welcome nor will the freedom inherent in our land protect them from the grip of the government while the other wraps himself up in the fabric of religion in ways that are bound to make orthodox Christians uneasy.  In the end, however, I am more for the one who will leave me alone than I am for the one who promises to remake America and right all our wrongs in the name of progress.  Sure as shootin, progress will come at a cost and it may well be the liberty that protects my right to worship without fear or threat from the government.  If I need improving (and I surely do), the Holy Spirit is the agent to do it and not the government.  Of all the rights so valuable to us in this blessed nation, none is as valuable as the right to be left alone.  It is this that moves my heart more than political promise or fear.

Sunday, October 27, 2024

Is the Reformation still relevant?

In case you were wondering if the Reformation was still relevant, here is one reason why it is:

I guess the Pope did not read where Jesus said He was the Way, the Truth, and the Life -- the only way to the Father in heaven.  In any case, despite his age, Pope Frank is pretty much in sync with the times and those who actually do agree with him.

If there was even a cause or reason for Lutheranism to remain vibrant and vital, it is in the strange and unChristian wonderings of this occupant of the throne of St. Peter.

To all my Roman Catholic friends:  This people is worse than an embarrassment.  He is a scandal to the faith and does more harm than good every time he opens his mouth.
 

Saturday, October 26, 2024

It's embarrassing. . .

One of the reasons people sometimes give for not going to private confession is that it is embarrassing to say out loud your sins.  Guess what.  It IS embarrassing.  It is surely embarrassing to confess your private sins with someone else listening.  We have tried very hard to presume that sins are not that much of a problem and that sin is nobody's business but yours.  But it is still embarrassing.  That is not the worst of it, however.  The embarrassment lasts for a moment but the consequence of sin is eternal.  It is not the embarrassment that required Christ to become incarnate for nor is it the embarrassment for which He died.  Sin is a  much bigger problem than a little embarrassment.  You need to get your head wrapped around that. 

Pastors are seldom embarrassed by your sins (we have heard it all before and we have our own sins to confess).  Pastors are impressed with the courage of those who own their sins and name them before the pastor.  It demonstrates a deep and profound faith.  It means that you get that the problem with sin is far bigger than the embarrassment.  It means you know that sin is not some mere inconvenience to us but literally is the reason for death.  If you are afraid your pastor might be embarrassed by what you confess before him, you are letting a little thing get in the way of a big thing -- the comfort and consolation of absolution.

No, Lutherans do not have to go to confession.  We do not have to eat foods we enjoy or go places either.  But we do.  Confession is valuable because Christ is there forgiving the sins that we have trouble forgiving and leaving at the foot of the cross.  Confession is for all ages, too.  You are not too young to confess your sins and you are not too old.  Try it out.  Give it a chance.  Do not be stymied by the feelings of guilt or shame or embarrassment and skip something that is a real and blessed gift from God.  Confession is not something to admire but the most practical of blessings for our everyday life.  Yes, we confess our sins on Sunday morning but there the confession is sufficiently general as to make it easy not to name the sins that trouble our consciences.  In private confession we get to confess precisely those sins and the pastor pronounces clear and personal absolution.  And unlike a general absolution, the pastor speaks your name and applies the forgiveness to that particular sin.  

If embarrassment is the big impediment keeping you from the grace of this sacramental act, get over it.  Embarrassment is not the big problem with sin.  Besides, half the sins people are embarrassed about get broadcast over social media anyway.  Why would we be embarrassed about them within the context of private confession before the pastor when we seem unfazed by them on social media?  The problem with sin is not that it is secret but that its effects affect are not.  Honestly, if you have been thinking about trying private confession, why not go to your pastor and set up an appointment now.  He will be duly impressed with the seriousness of your faith and you will walk away with a new understanding of how grace works.  It is a blessing just waiting for YOU.


Friday, October 25, 2024

What he does. . .

Those of you who know me know that I hate to be political especially in an election year.  That said, there is something worth our attention as we consider people both in secular office and in the life of the Church.  It is the difference, perhaps distinction, between rhetoric and actions, between words and deeds.  

Over the last four years or more we have heard many words from Democrats about the centrality of the family and bringing America together over the political divide and working together across the aisle.  But in actions we have witnessed a profound shift to the left from Biden and Harris.  On the other hand, Trump seems always to find a way to embarrass us with his bravado, ego, and insensitivity but his actions as President were profoundly friendly to the cause of religious freedom and to the cause of life.  Sometimes you have to look past what people say to what they have done.  I think it is true for most conservatives that this is the only way we can support a man like Trump.  On the other hand, those on the left are in a similar predicament.  Harris keeps reminding people that she has a gun even though she is decidedly on the other side of the second amendment most of the time.  People who want to strip the people of their firearms are willing to look past the words of Candidate Harris to see what she does with it all.  

The interesting thing here is neither Trump nor Harris.  They are both old news in a sense.  What I find most intriguing is how this same idea relates to a guy like Pope Francis.  His words have been sometimes a comfort to people who take the Christian faith seriously but his actions have been shockingly liberal.  He appoints people to leadership positions in the Roman Catholic Church who have challenged and even ridiculed the faith the Catechism of that body confesses.  Prime is the example of the Roman Catholic position on homosexuality and gender identity.  Yet even here Pope Francis is an enigma.  He publicly admits what appear to be his own doubts about the traditional teaching on such matters.  Even when his words have been good (on surrogacy, for example) his actions have been downright scary to orthodox Christians of all stripes.  He has appeared to be a breath of fresh air in the sale Vatican and yet he is the most controlling and vindictive of the modern popes and though he speaks of synodality he runs his part of the enterprise with a very heavy and centralized hand.

It is all a reminder that words matter but sometimes what matters even more are what people do.  This is especially true of politics but it is also true of religion.  I fear that this is the wave of the future -- political figures and religious leaders whose words and actions are not at all in the same vein.  If that is the case, we are in trouble.  We have little to judge our politicos by except their words and, when elected, their actions.  We have little to judge our religious leaders by except their words and, as we can see them, their actions.  It is a tragedy that our leaders in church and in state seem to say one thing and do another.  Even when the doing is better than their words, it leaves us more cynical than ever and more apt to disengage from both religion and politics.  And that is a bad thing!

It is time for us to take off the masks and to be who we are.  This would better serve the political process but it would also better serve our trust in people and institutions all around us.  Consistency is what we are looking for.  Without it we continually feel that we have been mocked, deceived, and bulldozed and have nothing to show for us except the scars.  There was a time when politicos were fairly reliable and consistent, when governing and religion were defined by principles and when a handshake actually meant something.

Thursday, October 24, 2024

Curious. . .

I am a product of the old system of educating pastors in the LCMS.  Junior college, senior college, then seminary -- all steeped in a classic liberal arts curriculum heavy on languages.  Hebrew was one of the hurdles to go through in order to find your way through the Senior College and into Seminary.  I wish I could say I was a star pupil.  I was not.  But enough of it seeped into my brain to make it through and I am rather grateful for that.  What is interesting, however, is that Hebrew is a bit like text criticism.  We do that stuff but I am not sure our heart is really in it.  Yes, it does matter what the text says and in order to know that you need to establish what that text is.  But, no, Christendom did not receive the Old Testament in Hebrew but largely through the Greek translation of the Septuagint.  And whatever you think of the text, we are bound to the accepted text as the Word of God (complete with the ending of St. Mark's Gospel).  So it has made me wonder why we spent so much time learning Hebrew and deal with textual criticism.

As others have said well before me and better than I, the early Christians knew Christ through the Greek text of the Septuagint.  Theirs was, after all, a Greek world of thought and the New Testament is a book in Greek, albeit Koine.  From what I am able to discover, most New Testament quotations seem to have their roots also in the Septuagint more than in the Hebrew text.  Yet I have this large volume of the Masoritic Text of the Hebrew Old Testament on my shelf in testament to the idea that this nuance did not matter -- we learn the text in its original tongue.  If all else fails, buy yourself and interlinear (aghast, you say, that I would even mention such a thing!).  

All of this is a way of reminding ourselves, no matter how interesting or compelling the arguments over the text, we are bound to a text that we do not prove to be original or authentic every time we open the pages of the Bible.  Even Rome holds up a translation as the most authoritative text -- in this case neither Greek nor Hebrew but Latin!  St. Jerome continues to be fairly persuasive, it would seem.  It is not without merit to know how we got to the text we have but we do not get to pick and choose in this text which parts we agree with or which we do not.  We might argue with the translator over which word accords best with the original but these are side arguments to the basic truth that we deal with the text we have.  That said, the New Testament and the Septuagint are replete with Greekisms that cannot be denied and they have made their way into the Creed as well as Scripture.  All in all, it is not such a big concern.  We are not conspiracy theorists like Dan Brown.  It is what it is.

Though we love the Latin phrase, ad fontes, the text is not quite an open question.  Even if we have not numbered in our confessional documents the number of books, we have accepted the canon as received and work from that to get where we are.  What we decidedly do NOT do is read back into the past modern presuppositions and conclusions.  Though this is difficult, it is not our job to read back into Scripture the modern lens with its vision and values.  Curiously that does not prevent the occasional preacher from actually saying "If Jesus were alive today...."  May I argue with you, sir?  So there we are.  Some things interesting are not essential and some things essential are not quite as interesting as the old arguments over which words of the Bible belong there. 

Wednesday, October 23, 2024

A favorite hymn. . .

Maybe it is the passing of time and the fact I am nearer my life's end than its beginning or maybe it has only to do with the hymns themselves but I find myself drawn to the songs of the night penned for us to sing by some of the most profound poets.  Chief among them is, of course, Paul Gerhardt.  

Paul Gerhardt (b. Gräfenheinichen, Saxony, Germany, 1607; d. Lubben, Germany, 1676), is by right the most famous author of Lutheran hymns -- having written more than 130 that were published!  He is no stranger to theology having studied at the University of Wittenberg.  He was friends with another Lutheran great, Johann Crüger.  Gerhardt was a pastor, serving the Lutheran parish of Mittenwalde near Berlin (1651-1657) and later the great St. Nicholas' Church in Berlin (1657-1666). He was too Lutheran for many.  Friederich William, the Calvinist elector, had sought to quiet doctrinal wars but he could not but oppose Calvinist doctrine trumping the Formula of Concord.  So he lost his job in Berlin in 1666, later serving as archdeacon at Lubben in 1669 until his death. 

Gerhardt's pen was written in the ink of suffering -- living in the era of the Thirty Years' War, burying four of his five children and then his wife died after a prolonged illness.  Gerhardt was a master of connecting the confessional doctrine of his church to a devotional and personal perspective. Like other German hymns of the time, Gerhardt's were long and elaborately developed. Oddly enough, we can thank both John Wesley and Catherine Winkworth for making Gerhardt's hymns known to the English world or he might have been forgotten.  Anyway...

The hymn that becomes dearer to me over time is variously translated but in our hymnal "Now Rest Beneath Night's Shadow."  The stanzas in italic are not in LSB.  The hymns of the night offer an especially rich treasure for prayer.  None, in my book, quite so lovely as Gerhardt's words:

1 Now rest beneath night's shadow
The woodland, field, and meadow;
The world in slumber lies.
But you, my heart, awaking
And prayer and music making,
Let praise to your Creator rise.

2 The radiant sun has vanished,
Its golden rays are banished
From dark'ning skies of night;
But Christ, the Sun of gladness,
Dispelling all our sadness,
Shines down on us in warmest light.

  1. The day is now declining,
    The golden stars are shining
    In bluest heav’nly hall;
    Thus, thus shall be my splendor,
    When my God calls me yonder
    From this world’s sad and mournful vale.

  2. To rest my body hasteth,
    Aside its garments casteth,
    Types of mortality;
    These I put off and ponder
    How Christ will give me yonder
    A robe of glorious majesty.

  3. Head, hands, and feet reposing
    Are glad the day is closing,
    That work came to an end;
    Cheer up, my heart, with gladness!
    For God from all earth’s sadness
    And from sin’s toil relief will send.

  4. Ye weary limbs! now rest you,
    For toil hath sore oppressed you,
    And quiet sleep ye crave!
    A sleep shall once o’ertake you
    From which no man can wake you,
    In your last narrow bed—the grave.

3 Now all the heav'nly splendor
Breaks forth in starlight tender
From myriad worlds unknown;
And we, this marvel seeing,
Forget our selfish being
For joy of beauty not our own.

4 Lord Jesus, since You love me,
Now spread Your wings above me
And shield me from alarm.
Though Satan would devour me,
Let angel guards sing o'er me:
This child of God shall meet no harm.

5 My loved ones, rest securely,
For God this night will surely
From peril guard your heads.
Sweet slumbers may He send you
And bid His hosts attend you
And through the night watch o'er your beds.

 


Tuesday, October 22, 2024

We're All Liberal Protestants. . .

As I have said repeatedly, it seems that the term conservative stands less for ideology than timing.  There are few viable conservative choices who advocate changing the direction of America but there are many who seem to insist that the pace of change slow even if its direction is unchanged.  Certainly Donald Trump is not a conservative but more a moderate.  His change in tone and position on abortion indicates that he is less driven by a moral principle in this debate than political expediency and by the desire to let the people decide.  It is also a libertarian view.  Get rid of the rules and leave people to do what they will and reduce government to a minimum of essential responsibilities and duties.  Kamala Harris represents an equally politically driven view of the issues even though her instincts are to make government more a force for nearly everything in life.  In the end, the choice is less about clear differences than the pace of change and who drives it -- Trump slows it down and lets the people decide and Harris wants the government out front and gas pedal down.  The same is true with respect to religion.

The other day I read a Roman Catholic commentator who said, "Many of us [Roman] Catholics in the United States are actually liberal Protestants with rosary beads."  I wonder how people took those words.  Of course, he is correct.  We have, as have all Americans, consumed liberal Protestantism "with our mother’s milk"  It has become part of the fabric of our moral, social and political soul.  The very air that we breathe is tinged with it.  This is no less true for conservative Lutherans than it is for Roman Catholics.  Conservative has become a term to describe the pace of change rather than its direction.  I get it.  We all are dizzied by the very pace of change in nearly every aspect of our mortal lives.  Nothing is the same -- not even the price of a gallon of milk!  We welcome a slow and more deliberate pace to all that is changing and with it a moment to catch our breath.  But that is not what it means to be a conservative in any aspect of things.  Conservatives conserve.  So far we saw a Supreme Court knock down a federal right to abortion that became the fuel for more abortions than ever.  But some folks are happy simply because the federal rule was broken.  Is that really conservation?

The sad reality is that in nearly every denomination there is a majority of folk who are not as upset with the direction of change as they are is tenor or speed.  They want a kinder and gentler church which will not die on every hill and leave somethings to pass.  They want simply to remove from the national stage the focus on how you have sex with those to whom you are attracted and what identity you wear today as the gender identity you want the world to know.  But those same Christians seem unwilling to talk about marriage in terms that Scripture uses or to admit that there is an order to God's creation even of male and female.  Those same Christians want peace in their families even if that means remaining quiet in the face of cohabitation, sexual experimentation, children outside of marriage, and the like.  We are all liberal Protestants underneath but differ primarily in how fast and how far the social changes around us should proceed.

This is even true of Biblical theology.  We all say that the Scriptures are God's Word in some form or another and that the Bible proclaims the true pathway to salvation.  But we are not at all sure we want to pay attention to the Word of God in its fullness or to get much deeper than the shallow Gospel of love, forgiveness, and why can't everyone just get along.  We believe that the Bible tells of Him who is the Way but we see parallel ways in other religions and in none.  It is not so much that we are works righteous people as we simply are not sure that sins matter all that much anymore and neither does God care much about them.

Underneath liberal Protestantism are the essential values of radical personal autonomy and an absolute  individualism as the core and foundation of all moral values.  These things are not the essential values of orthodox and catholic Christianity.  That is the problem.  In addition to this is the whole idea that the church is nothing more than a voluntary association, created and defined by the will of those who choose to belong.  The same penchant for government by poll has given way to doctrine and practice by poll.  The Scriptures are merely advisory in this understanding.  Doctrine is subordinate and accountable to our autonomous individual consciences.  The reality is that most of us subscribe to and practice in our daily lives the very moral and political language of liberalism and our agreement in doctrine and truth is more a felicitous inconsistency we celebrate than an essential foundation of or identity to our religious beliefs and identity.

Until we address the elephant in every room -- individual rights, voluntarism, and privatized morality -- we differ more in degree than in essence with liberal Protestantism even though we call ourselves conservatives or catholics.  I suspect there might be some disagreement here but I welcome the conversation.

Monday, October 21, 2024

Silence. . .

Our presumption is that when the Church is silent, devoid of conversation or laughter or movement, it is empty.  I admit that I once thought such foolishness.  I had been taken in by those who insist that our life together be manifest in the vibrant give and take of people speaking out loud and loudly of all things.  We all seem to have taken it to heart.  Churches have become rather noisy places.  You hear the sound of texts and outrageous rings of our cell phones.  Organists play louder to let people know it is time to shut up and people speak more loudly as if to compete with the organ.  In either case, there is little room for silence.

When the Church is silent, it is not because it is cold or empty but because there is going on within that silence the ministry of prayer.  Could it be that we are uncomfortable with silence precisely because we are ill at ease with prayer?  Our lives are noisy because we are not sure what to do with silence.  When we get home we turn on music or the TV so that there is the sound of something.  We wear our earbuds all the time because silence has become almost unbearable to us.  We listen to podcasts as background noise and it could be old episodes of Andy Griffith or our favorite Christian commentator but it is noise to fill the silence that feels odd to us. Could it be that reading has become less popular in part because it involves silence -- words that live not upon our lips but in our minds?  I guess we would all prefer noise to the sound of silence.

Perhaps we will never recover an ease with silence again.  Noise has so firmly been entrenched in our minds and lives that we need it.  When I go to my hometown in Nebraska, I am struck by how silent it is compared to the small city where I live.  There are no sirens or speakers pumping out what passes for music or motorcycles tearing up the boulevards.  There is the sound of the wind or rain or nothing really at all.  At first it seems weird but then it feels exactly right.  I have to learn to be comfortable with silence again.  Once I learn that, the noise is ever more obvious.  As a boy growing up my dad would take advantage of the silence in the morning hours before everyone awoke.  He sat in his chair with Bible, Portals of Prayer, catechism, and Book of Concord open and he prayed.  Sometimes I got up early to sit on the steps and watch him.  It seemed so serene and profound.  It was.  It is.

As I grow older I hope to recapture the sense of silence.  I will trade an office filled with banter and keyboards and conversations for the quiet of a house and its ordinary rhythms.  Some of them involve words and some do not.  Some involve sounds and some do not.  It will be a welcome reunion with the peace of silence which is not empty at all.  When that happens, I hope also to learn again to pray without ceasing, to pray the words of Scripture and catechism, to pray the hymns and the Divine Service, and to pray from prayerbook and breviary.  When I find my peace with silence and discover again that it is not empty but full of the sound of God, then I will also learn again the joy of the Psalmist:

“And I shall go in unto the altar of God.”
“To God, who gives joy to my youth.”

Sunday, October 20, 2024

The potential for light. . .

So far, end of life issues have been more muddy than clear and more laced with sentiment than values or principles.  That said, there is potential for us to look at matters of death and come forth with a more positive view of life.  I did not quite say I had hope for this to take place but there is the possibility that looking at death may actually lead us to a more fruitful and godly view of life.  By the way, I am not at all saying that this is the time for the dying to have a more introspective assessment of their own lives but an actual and honest appraisal of life by those who are left to deal with the death.

Thus far that has not been the case.  Instead, we have put more of the focus on controlling the symptoms, that is dealing with discomfort, pain, and anxiety.  And, thus far, that has been largely a medication approach to it all -- giving enough morphine to relieve the family as well as the dying of too much upset and pain.  I am not a fan of this overall and have argued with the more aggressive approach of some involved in hospice to medicate the dying into death.  Unless pain is the complaint, the medicine has become a mask for something else.  The something else is the passive and sometimes more overt desire to hasten death as opposed to providing a palliative care that makes the dying (and the family) more comfortable.

I well recall how it went when my wife and I went to see her step-mother who was near the end of her life.  This was a woman full of life and a quaint innocence that we both thoroughly enjoyed (though at times we found it confounding).  She refused to go quietly into death.  Her raised arms and enthusiastic voice indicated that she was not going to sleep her way into death -- at least not yet.  Instead, she talked almost incessantly and spoke time after time of the stories that were her life and ours with her.  It was exhilarating for us standing around her.  Instead of the awkward silence of those who watched the hours pass while gazing on the sleep of those making their way into death, this was a loud and raucous conversation about anything and everything that had touched her life.  I loved it.

Of course, I know that this is not and will not be the universal circumstance of loved ones and families but it could be more frequent and more common.  We do not need to tip toe around the dying.  We do not need to walk on egg shells around death.  We need to talk about it and we need it to make us begin the talking.  While the dying may not be able to walk or sit up or even eat, most of them can and will talk if given the chance.  My greatest regrets in the time I have spent with the dying was succumbing to the silence and presuming that it was better to whisper than to speak aloud.  Now I am loud -- too loud for some.  I call the dying by name and gently but firmly inquire if they are ready to die.  I invite them to address the Lord and their families with the things on their hearts and minds while they are able.  I urge the family to do the same.

It is in this way that death can set us free to deal with urgent things instead of packing them away or medicating them away while awaiting the final breath.  If we do this, we may just learn something about living by the way we approach the dying.  It cannot hurt.  The way we hide the dying away and medicate them into silence and ignore the elephant in the room has not made us better people nor has it improved the way we deal with the messiness of death.  So why not try talking about it.  Talking with the dead about dying?!  We used to pray regularly for a good death or a blessed one.  I fear that we have forgotten how important this is.  It is by learning to recognize a blessed or good death that we begin to appreciate anew the gift of life.  Living cannot tell you much about dying but dying can certainly tell you a great deal about living. 

Saturday, October 19, 2024

Raising up pastors. . .

Roman Catholics have gone to having "vocation directors" to assist in the consideration by men and formation of those men as priests.  I am not sure how successful that has been.  Though nearly every diocese has one of those thingies, the seminaries of most dioceses are pretty empty.  We have not quite gone to that in the Missouri Synod but we are headed there.  Our seminaries employ "admission counselors" to aid and support those considering the pastoral vocation.  Again, look at the declining enrollment and you can quickly figure out this is not the solution either.

It was once said in Rome that good priests inspired young men to become priests.  We said the same thing.  Good pastors inspire young men to become pastors.  So does that mean we are short of good pastors since we seem to be struggling to recruit young men to be pastors?  I am not ready to go there -- yet.  But I do think that there is something else that is missing.  You do not recruit young men to be pastors by inviting them for coffee but it probably does not hurt.  What is hurting is that we have come to a point where we are not sure that pastors should be strong men.  No one wants to be recruited to a job that is offered to those who cannot do anything else nor do they desire a vocation where it does not require or compel them to be anything but themselves.  Yet this seems to be precisely the problem.

In our congregation we seem to value the flexible over those with conviction and the get along pastors over those who would die on a hill for an important cause.  It would be like training a fighting force to win a stalemate at best or to lose without shame.  I fear that we are not sure as a church body that we want strong pastors and so we do not encourage young men to a strong career but rather to a weak one.  Who wants that?  When I began my pre-seminary education at St. John's in Winfield, KS, I was not sure I was smart enough or strong enough or gifted enough to be a pastor.  All around me there were young men who were better than I was at Greek or speaking or in their piety.  I persevered because of the strong encouragement of professors such as Dr. Edward F. Peters or Dr. H. Andrew Harnack.  I kept at it because all around me were men of conviction and I wanted to be one.

Sadly, we are afraid of people of conviction today and so we offer to young men not a strong vocation but a weak one.  It is not simply feminization that has afflicted the Church but the promotion of toleration, compromise, popularity, preference, and desire over doctrine and truth and conviction.  We are hampered in our recruitment of young men for the office because we have made this office into something less than strong.  It is not about accessibility or approachability but about conviction.  I well remember the advice I got -- don't become a pastor because it is something you can do; become a pastor because you it is something you must do.

I read an article which suggested that there was a time in history when celibacy was considered less of an impediment to recruiting than the office itself.  In other words, celibacy was not the liability but the priesthood was.  Now it is certainly the other way around.  The priesthood is the goal and celibacy is the impediment some see to that goal.  To put this in Lutheran terms, do we value the life we seek more than the vocation or are we willing to sacrifice the life we want (in worldly terms) for the holy calling of pastor (the calling is holy even if we as pastors are not!).  Perhaps it is true that we have not held up the sacrifice as the very magnet to the calling.  If that is the case, it is no wonder that we are struggling.  Men value a challenge.  Give them one.  The pastoral office is not for the many but for the few, for those who must be pastors and not for those who might.  As the sainted Dr. Korby once said, "God ordains men; be one!"

Friday, October 18, 2024

Masons and Christians. . .

Where I grew up, the old saw was that the Missouri Synod church outside of town did not approve of Masons but the Augustana Synod LCA congregation in town not only accepted Masons but approved of them.  Oddly enough, Masons were not only a Missouri Synod issue.  In 1983, then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger upheld the Roman Catholic concern.  This future Pope Benedict XVI said bluntly that “the Church’s negative judgment in regard to Masonic association remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church.”   Therefore, “membership in them remains forbidden. The faithful who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion.”  Forty years later under Pope Francis, this “irreconcilability” was reaffirmed as the numbers of Roman Catholics joining the Masonic order seems to have increased.  At the same time, the president of the Pontifical Academy of Theology, Bishop Antonio Staglianò, has reiterated the incompatibility of Roman Catholics belonging to the Masons days after participating in an event organized by the Italian Grand Orient lodge in Milan.  And, a cardinal taking part in a “historic” closed-door meeting on Friday between the heads of Italy’s Freemasonic lodges and senior Roman Catholic Church leaders has called for a “permanent” dialogue to be opened with the secretive organization, despite masonry being long condemned by the Church.

Some snicker at the whole idea of the Masons being a threat to Christianity.  Others vilify the Masonic Lodge as being the worst of threats.  The truth lies in the middle.  It is neither benign nor does it approach the internal problems of doctrine and confession that are existential threats to the faith.  That said, it does appear that still an issue for conservative Lutherans and for Rome.  Freemasonry seems most popular in the British Isles and in other countries originally within the British empire but it seems to have a significant number in Italy as well. Estimates of the worldwide membership of Freemasonry in the early 21st century ranged from about two million to more than six million but, as a secret society, it does not publish its membership roll.  The ideology of brotherhood and its traditional focus on gaining knowledge,  knowing history, and civic improvement come with a commitment to help the brotherhood individually for the sake of all. The Masons share the idea that their brotherhood is not for the moment but for all eternity.  The concern for the Church is that the Masonic tie is deeper and more profound than belonging to Christ through the Church.  If for this reason only, the Masonic order remain under suspicion by serious Christianity and the judgment of the Missouri Synod and Rome stands -- it is incompatible with Christian faith.  No matter how much some protest this judgment, the reality is that these two visions of the world and of God are irreconcilable and for the Christian, the Christian faith is our highest allegiance and our doctrine the fruit not of reason but of divine revelation.  

Curious how things like this continue to pop up....


Thursday, October 17, 2024

The cost of compromise. . .

Everyone loves compromise.  If you can move something stalled along even an inch you have made progress, right?  Except that the compromises promoted in the cause of solving the abortion conflict are Trojan horses.  One of them is the so-called 15 week ban.  Abortion is banned after 15 weeks (lest you have forgotten that is nearly four months of a typical nine month pregnancy).  There is a problem here.  The compromise sounds tempting until you realize that 96% of abortions happen before 15 weeks!  In other words, you have given up everything to gain almost nothing.

So, adjust the number of weeks, right?  Why not simply ban abortion after 6 weeks (a month and a half of the pregnancy and well after it is obvious that the woman is pregnant).  The problem with this is that  44.8% of all abortions happen before the 6 weeks are up.  In other words, we are still allowing more than half of the babies in the womb to be killed at whim.  The issue is not about moving the line but whether or not we believe that the life in the womb of worthy of our protection?

It would be similar to saying you disapprove of murder if more than four people are killed but you might find your way around tolerating the murder of one or two people.  Either murder is wrong or it is not.  Either abortion is the taking of an innocent life or it is not.  How can you find a moderate position on an extreme issue?  It is like being on a diet that cuts down the number of desserts you have after every meal from 10 to 9 or from 10 to 5.  Are you going to lose weight?  Of course not!  But neither will you have to change your life all that much.  The right to life debate is not about how many children we can afford to kill or how many elderly or how many disabled, it is about the core value of life itself.  At some point we will need to recognize that this value is not won at the ballot box or at the court level but in the essential values that unite us as a nation.  Sadly, in that battle, we have not yet won any significant victory.

 

Wednesday, October 16, 2024

Only the tolerant are tolerated. . .

For a very long time it has been presumed and taught that only the wise and the strong are able to change their minds and their thinking.  Indeed, in order to be wise and strong you must be able to place what you believe and hold into the background and engage those things that challenge or conflict with what you believe and hold.  Weak people are ideological and foolish people hold to such things as Christian faith.  The goal of life ought to be how to tolerate every opinion and judgment and preference as equal, equally moral, and equally respectable -- except the intolerant ones, of course.

The reality is that this is the fallacy of nihilism.  The absence of conviction is not strength or wisdom but just the opposite.  The insistence that words and acts be freed from morality and conviction does nothing good but creates an unhealthy and unstable world -- just the kind we are living in today.  Our society and world are not in danger from people who believe too much but those who believe nothing except what they feel or desire or experience.  Even these are not the overriding principles that define a person and their character but limited to a moment and without a lasting impact over the life or thought of the person.  This is the reason that politicians seem to shift positions constantly and why the public seems not to care about these flip flops or detours.  This is the reason why religions which are popular are those seemingly divorced from their convictions from their holy books or great teachers.  Moderate religion is all in vogue precisely because it mirrors the same flexibility and detached truth that is in favor with culture, education, and society as a whole.  It is all good.  Except that it isn't.

The elevation of tolerance to the primary virtue over fact, truth, and belief has left us floating on a sea of change with nary a rudder around us to direct where we are headed or how we will get there.  We awaken every morning to discover anew where we are.  In this world, the one thing needful is not what you believe or confess nor is it tied to virtue but ends up being respect for diversity and individuality above all.  The society is at work creating an uninhibited culture of individuality in which the very same individuals are devoid of conviction -- except diversity and tolerance and equal weight to all opinions (except those deemed intolerant).  When Christian duty and submission to accepted morality began to die out, the very fabric of our unity and our responsibility also began to wane.

People have come to desire more than all other things their own choice -- without judgment or challenge.  In such a world, a common life is hard to establish and community difficult to instill.  Even more difficult is responsibility to family or neighbor.  Think how easily we began to believe the lie that it is more important for husband and wife to be happy than to be dad or mom to their children.  This thinking has surely pervaded the educational establishment in America and it has flooded the home and family as well.  We owe no one anything except to be true to ourselves.  It sounds so noble but it is childish and selfish.  The situation is exacerbated by the decay of religious knowledge and education of the people and by the promotion of a most illiberal education in which facts and truth matter little.  Sadly, even science has been hogtied and roped into service to the ideal of a valueless world in which true to self is the greatest freedom.  The old science of test and result that leads to truth has given way to truth that defines how to test and what result to achieve.

In the end, this is the worst form of intolerance because it masks what is true freedom and tars and feathers this ideal with the most shameful of condemnation only to leave us without cause or means to communicate with integrity or debate what is good or evil or improve what is wrong.  The biggest lie of all is that we need to understand ourselves and the world around us and accept what we find in that world and in that unrestrained self.  Everyone does what is right in their own eyes has as its worst outcome that there is no evil, no boundary to rein in our unfettered desire, and no ability to reflect upon words or actions and their value for the whole as well as the me.

Tuesday, October 15, 2024

So many internet oddities. . .

So I read something on social media brought to me by a member where a Lutheran has said he repents of his good works.  Given that a few weeks ago we heard James insist that faith without works is dead and issue the challenge:  you show me your faith and I will show you my works, it is almost comical how we can raise up straw men and then end up saying something foolish and confusing.  No one but a fool would suggest that our good works are perfect in and of themselves or that they contribute anything to our salvation but Lutherans have always been on the side of good works that always accompany a living faith.  In fact, we cooperate with the Spirit in these good works.  So I guess if you help the homeless person or mow your neighbor's law when they are ill you should go right home and repent of those works to the Lord and beg His forgiveness.  But that is not all there is.

There are also those who insist that the love that is the fulfilling of the Law is a different love than the love born of the Gospel.  Hmmm.  I guess we need to add more words or definitions to nuance a difference that does not seem to be there in the text.  Oh, well, it would not be the first time we massaged a different meaning into the Scriptures.  In the end it only confuses and muddies up the waters.  One love is the love the Law expects and demands and the other is the love that Christ gives.  Because it is of the Law, that love is not nearly as good or as wonderful as the love that Christ gives.  It makes love one another as I have loved you into something radically different from the love one another as you love yourself.  Is it that love that is different?  Or, is it the heart that loves which is different?

There are also those who insist that the Gospel love not simply surpasses but negates the love that fulfills the Law -- sort of an end run around the commandments.  In this argument, Jesus is not merely fulfilling the Law but replacing it with a new Law -- the law of love.  This law is perfect freedom not because it changes the desires of the heart but because it releases the heart from having to change.  Jesus is the Savior not from immorality defined by the Law but so that you can indulge in it without guilt or shame.  Whata guy!

Perhaps chief among these is the whole idea "Jesus would not want me to..."   You fill in the blank.  Jesus would not want me to suffer, to deny myself, to give up what I enjoy, to sacrifice my desires, to endure threat for the sake of the faith, etc...  The only problem is that Jesus is recorded as having said that this is exactly what lies before us if we follow Him and this is His call to those who would be His disciples.  Take up the cross (suffer), deny yourself, be concerned with others before yourself, the desires of your heart are evil and must be transformed, you will be persecuted, threatened, and even martyred for His name...  All of these things sound so appealing to us and we are taken in by them because we know what we want better than we know God's Word.

So read Scripture.  Get a good and solid study Bible to help you.  Join a Bible study group at your church (hopefully with a pastor teaching it).  Connect with some of the great podcasts available (from Issues, Etc., to The Word of the Lord Endures Forever).  Do not get your theology from social media.  Caveat emptor.

 

Monday, October 14, 2024

The only growing faith. . .

The shape of Western Europe with its deep history and legacy of faith is eroding away both in practice and in reality.  The once vibrant Christian origins of Europe have been replaced by a society in which Islam is the only growing faith and the rest are in decline.  It is a sobering reality.  We see it everywhere.  In Scandinavia the religious fervor of the past has been replaced by a passion for environment, sexual liberation, and a sustainable lifestyle.  This is what God and redemption have come to mean where Lutherans were once a profound, singing, and practicing and near universal majority.  In Europe, the Luther lands with their sites so important to Reformation history have become tourist ghettos in which the population loves to market the past but has no real or living faith to be nurtured by the Word and Table of the Lord.  Roman Catholics are equally absent from worship and polls tell the same story of a faith at least diluted if not practically absent from daily life.  Indeed, the story of the fire at Notre Dame and its rebuilding treat this as a tragedy to a historical landmark more than one for a community of faith gathered under its roof.  This says it all.  As many have said, there is no room for God in Europe except to be a footnote to its history.

That Islam is the only growing faith is not simply due to immigration but to the decline in the birth rate. Of course, it is also due to the alarming rate that Christians seem to be pushing faith into the realm of feeling over fact and distancing doctrine from spirituality.  The once overflowing worship spaces have become excess real estate or historical monuments or mere community space to house everything from painting classes to yoga.  As we watch the buildings become largely secular spaces, we are also seeing societies and individual lives move much more into the realm of the secular over the religion of their fathers (whether Lutheran or Roman Catholic).  Where prayers were once offered, spaces now function as museums or art displays.  Where people once knelt in solemn joy receiving the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus, people now dance or listen to music.  Where preaching once spoke God's Word into the hearts of the hearers, now poetry is read or a self help class meets.  Of course, the special spaces will be preserved but not for worship.  Worship is the occasional activity of even those buildings deemed culturally significant.  The form remains but the heart is empty.  Christianity is not growing but declining and rapidly.  Islam grows where the fertile soil of society once welcomed the Scriptures and where people once cared enough about doctrine to even fight over it.  No more.

We can content ourselves to think that God is purifying His Church and weeding His garden to get rid of those less than true believers.  If that is what floats your boat, I guess it is consolation enough for now.  But not for me.  I am not content to see the Church merely survive.  I pray you are unwilling to settle for that as well.  We may not control society on the grand scale but we can preserve the faith in our hearts, preserve the faith in the home, preserve the truth by teaching our children and speaking it back and forth to each other.  We may not be able to affect the great society content to see children as burden or ornaments but we can be fruitful and multiply in our own families and train up our children in the way they should go.  We may not be able to influence the taste of culture for art that is not vulgar or music that has no melodic value but we can sing the sturdy hymns of old and teach our children to sing them as well.  In short, Islam is growing because that faith lives in the home as well as in the mosque.  Perhaps we need to learn the lesson.  The Church will not save the Christian religion without the home beating with the same heart of faith.  We can afford to lose the real estate but we cannot afford to lose the home.  That is Europe's problem and it will become ours unless we mark Christ as the center of our homes as well as our churches. 

Sunday, October 13, 2024

Where God cannot be, He is

Every now and then you encounter from the pews as well as the world the familiar complaint about God and the presence of suffering.  How can God allow it?  Tolerate it?  Where is God when suffering takes place?  Like the disciples of old, it is our nature to presume that suffering bespeaks and absent God and an absence of God and His grace.  When they asked Jesus "who sinned" at the encounter of the man born blind, it was tacit admission that God could not have been in the mix of things.  If God had been, there would be no blindness and if God was, it was surely to assigned judgment.  This is our default position since the Fall in Eden.  God cannot be where pain lives or suffering exists -- except in judgment as the One who inflicts pain and suffering as punishment for sin.

The cross is the shock of a God who is not merely present in suffering as a spectator but who comes for suffering.  God is in the pain of the whip and the nails and even to the final breath exhaled in surrender to death.  God is not merely there as victim, though surely as victim, but as the One for whom this pain and this suffering were planned before the foundation of the world.  He is the God whose mercy is not revealed in the absence of pain and suffering but there in the midst of it all.  His work is not to condemn and to assign punishment of pain and suffering but to use the pain and suffering to extend His mercy and grace.  This He most surely does in Christ, in His righteous life, in His suffering to end suffering, and in His life-giving death. Where we presume God cannot be, there He is and there He is doing the redemptive work that delivers us from sin and judgment, from pain and suffering, to righteousness and everlasting life.

We constantly ponder why a good and powerful God allows suffering, pain, and evil?  Is He impotent to eliminate it for us?  Does He not wish to forego this for us?  Is He complicit in it?  Does He send it?  For us the great temptation is to presume our God is a detached God, an aloof God, who watches us while looking down from heaven but who either cannot or wills to do nothing to help us.  God's surprise is that He comes for suffering, enters into our pain, takes the evil of our sins upon Himself, and bears the full weight of that sin and death for us that we might be redeemed.  He thirsts that our thirst might be quenched.  He fasts in hunger so that our hunger might be satisfied.  He lives to die that by dying in baptismal water we might live.  God enters into suffering not as an experiment to see what it is but to end its reign over us.  Isaiah tells us.  His wounds are our healing and His sacrifice is our gain.  

We are so fixed upon the question of why this suffering comes to us and why we as Christians face such pain that perhaps we miss how God has come to suffer with us and, more importantly for us, and by this suffering redeems us from the condemnation of suffering and pain.  He is present with us not as an antidote to what we endure but that these sufferings might have a redemptive and sanctifying purpose even in us.  We do not suffer aimless pain but in Christ all sufferings have their end, find their meaning, and have purpose.  Where we think God cannot be, there He is.