One clinic worker testified that she saw aborted fetuses moving,
breathing and, once, “screeching.” Another described a 2-foot-long fetus
that “didn’t have eyes or a mouth, but it was like … making this noise.
… It sounded like a little alien.”
A third witness recalled how,
as ordered, she used surgical scissors to snip the spine of an aborted
fetus she’d found in a toilet, its arm still moving. “I did it once, and
I didn’t do it again,” she said. “… It gave me the creeps.”
The above quoted from the USA Today...
As shocking as what the testimony given, what is most shocking to me is what USA Today calls the breathing child who survives an abortion. USA calls them aborted fetuses. Foolish me, I thought we called them babies.
It would seem that abortion doctor Gosnell has two things going for him. Most of his clients were poor, Black women and aborted black children. In our age, neither group has much political standing. So this terrible travesty of medical practice and his killing machine which operated with brutality, strangely insulated from the horror of what they were doing, went on for 17 years before anyone noticed enough to do anything about it. What kind of pro-choice sanctions such an absurdity? What kind of newspaper has the gall to call living, breathing, moving babies aborted fetuses? Words are often used to mask the horror and minimize the shock of things as much as to magnify them. I hope that these paltry words are exposed for their failure to sufficiently describe to us the terror of this man and the scandal of a culture of death that allows it...
1 comment:
Really, the families of the deceased women should be able to sue the state or local regulatory agency that NEVER inspected that place!
Post a Comment