Sunday, March 5, 2017

Democracy and Liturgy. . .

To a large degree, how we see the liturgy and what we understand of worship has been shaped more by our modern ideas of democracy than by the kingly heritage of the Old Testament and the formal character of the worship of the Temple.  We as Americans rightly or wrongly believe that democracy is the best and ought to be the only good form of government but that is more of a progressive notion than one of reason.  Yes, I love our democracy but I also believe that a benevolent monarchy is probably more beneficial and certainly more efficient.  That said, I see no prospect of a monarchy in our future and, messy or not, we have a form of government that expects more from our citizens than some.  We have struggled of late with the weaknesses of democratic government in part because of those who choose not to participate (except to criticize) and the back and forth between one side and another that has hardened the divisions in our land.  So it is not without precedent that we face the worship wars and the great divide within Christian worship that is also the fruit of rather democractic notions of participation, preference, and purpose.

Our democratic values should not abolish the place of language and ceremony born of kingship and courtliness -- no matter how these might transgress our politically correct esteem of democracy and egalitarianism.  In fact we must read into the Scriptures our modern governmental ideals for what is there is a rather blunt and distinct perspective of a divine kingdom ruled not by common consent but by the gracious will and purpose of King, Jesus Christ.  All our modern preference of participation and preference will fall away when, at the end of time, the glorious reign of Christ the King is revealed to the nations (not only to believers) and the elect of God will be raised to eternal life in a glorified flesh to dwell before Him in the glorious marriage supper of the Lamb in His kingdom without end.  Those who reject Him and who insist upon being equals before Him and with Him till wail and gnash their teeth in the unending torment of eternal fire. The liturgy must reflect the whole truth of God and not merely the truth we find acceptable — His absolute monarchy, His paternal rule, His hierarchical court which are the very revelation of St. John in whose vision of unspeakable splendor we encounter the heavenly Jerusalem.  In short, though it is our penchant to tinker with the liturgy, to make it accord with democratic notions of participation and preference, the liturgy is the first glimpse of the eternal -- an eternal which will not be shaped by consumer preference or by political ideals but by God's design and purpose.  It is what it is and faith believes that it is good, right, salutary, and a blessed mystery — beyond our comprehension and imagination but yet anticipated within the Divine Service.

Democracy and egalitarianism cry out for fairness and equal opportunity -- the priest/pastor should not be the only voice, others should have their opportunity to serve (in the spotlight), male and female leadership roles should have primary importance in who does what, age and youth must be equally represented in leadership roles, and the horizontal dimension should be emphasized over the vertical in the liturgy.  Let's face it.  This is some of what we have heard since the liturgical reforms of post-Vatican II and those in Lutheran and other circles (inspired by Roman Catholic liturgical reform).  Further, the pristine ideals of the early church were presumed to accord more with the democratic and egalitarian ideals of modernity and the kingly characteristics of the Divine Service were believed to have been accretions of later times that obscured the earlier blessed simplicity.

So if there are those who think that the present shape of liturgy is too clergy dominant, too regal, too heavenly, and too ceremonial, well, then there will be some who are sure to be disappointed when they encounter the grandeur of the heavenly liturgy in the Marriage Supper of the Lamb without end.  For surely the pale and paltry earthly anticipation of this divine mystery will be replaced by a reality far beyond what we could possibly replicate on earth.  Read the Revelation of St. John.  Look at Sunday morning.  There is nothing in the heavenly promise to justify the democratic and egalitarian novelties that have characterized a certain aspect of liturgical reform -- both in Rome and in Wittenberg.
  

3 comments:

Kirk Skeptic said...

Having been among the low-chruches for a considerable time, I find it funny how those who protest about the strictures of liturgy have no problem with the strictures of their own beliefs: Pastoral prayers as ling as sermons (written down rather than spontaneous, btw), hobby-horse/laundry list preaching, infrequent communion, etc. A friend of mine knew a Pentecostal whose church service ended "when the Sprit bid us to depart" - which, amazingly enough, was at noon. So much for freedom and spontaneity.

ErnestO said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ErnestO said...

I always thank the people who tell me the liturgy is such an “Old School” part of the church. The same people I suspect upon the second coming of Christ will still be staring at the screens on their phones. Their only hope will be that someone else’s life will flash before their eyes…..Judgment will fall upon these people with great finality. That being said it is our duty to pray for them and to share the gospel with them. They constitute the largest portion of our mission field, and need to understand the church is and always will be different than the society we live in.