Wednesday, December 19, 2018

The problem of digital giving. . .

Let me begin by saying I understand the problems of giving in a cashless society.  I, myself, seldom carry cash and, if I do, I carry very little cash.  The debit card has taken over the check book and cash as the ordinary way to pay for things.  My parish has had electronic giving in one form or another for many years -- though most recently it has become a very significant potion of the total money received for the work of the Kingdom.  So I am NOT suggesting that we buck the trend and insist upon cash or check as the only acceptable means for giving to the Lord and supporting the work of His Church.  That said, the challenge of cashless giving does have theological implications -- especially within the liturgy. The question is not whether or not to use digital forms of giving but maintaining the connection between the liturgical offertory and the tithes and offerings of the faithful.  This is not simply a matter of how best to provide means for people to give but how to connect this giving to our own deep and profound Eucharistic theology.

I am, in so may ways, indebted to the wisdom and work of the Rev. Heath Curtis, pastor of Trinity Lutheran in Worden, Illinois.  He is certainly tasked with this responsibility on behalf of the LCMS but he is also devoted to the topic, as witnessed by his August 2018 interview on the Issues, Etc.  Curtis has rightfully reminded us that from the Western Church’s ancient beginnings, the offertory is related to the Eucharist, and its position in the middle of Mass, between the Liturgy of the Word and the Liturgy of the Eucharist, is not accidental but deliberate. In reviewing the liturgical history of the offertory, Curtis explained the people would bring up their gifts of bread and wine to the priest, as well as the first fruits of their labor, which they offered up to God for the support of the church. From these first fruits, the priest would offer up the bread to the Father, on behalf of the community, bread that would become the Body of Christ in the Eucharist.

“It absolutely matters how people give liturgically,” Curtis said. The Offertory, he said, is not simply a transition point between the Mass of the Catechumens and the Mass of the Faithful, but for the people to “worship the Lord with the sacrifice of their giving.”  Pastor Curtis said churches need to think deliberately about how to maintain that act of worship in giving and respond to the ways in which people are giving.  The important task of the Church with respect to giving is to establish for the giving members the context of “first-fruits giving,” the setting aside or the tithe or a dedicated portion of their income to the Lord before their money goes to anything else, is a liturgical act whether done online or in the pew, whether it is done weekly or monthly or even quarterly. People who give automatically this way must be taught this connection and catechized in this connection so that even digital giving maintains this appropriate context for what we give and how we give it.

It is always an easy and tempting idea that giving to the Lord the tithes and offerings of a grateful people is really just paying a bill -- the same way we routinely pay bills online.  When this happens and the liturgical shape of this giving disappears, this temptation is even grater to see giving as fair share activities and subscription fees in exchange either for belonging to or receiving services from the Church.  Surely as we approach the solemn and profound season of the Father's gift of His most precious Son, it is time for us to speak anew of the worship of hands and resources to accompany our words, songs, and prayers.  The response of God's people to God's most amazing gift is to kneel in worship, adore God in flesh, believe the Word of Promise about Him, and offer Him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh, as once the Magi did in Bethlehem and the wise still do in the Bethlehem of the Lord's House where He comes to us in the bread that is His flesh and in the cup of His blood. 

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Those who give electronically may still place an envelope in the offering plate with a notation on it - "Give Electronically." Or, they may place a dollar bill or some other token amount in the envelope. This is done by some who only give a check or cash monthly in order to maintain the semblance of giving an offering.

Anonymous said...

I'd like to know why Heath Curtis, pastor of a tiny congregation in Illinois, became an expert on Christian stewardship.

If my congregation does not want my sizeable weekly offering via direct giving, let me know.

Otherwise, your liturgical purists can stick it up your ass.

There is NOTHING in the Scriptures to support this bullshit you are advocating here, Pr. Peters.

Get a grip.

David Gray said...

You'd think "Anonymous" was giving to the congregation rather than God...

Anonymous said...

Pastor Peters clearly wrote"the challenge of cashless giving does have theological implications -- especially within the liturgy. The question is not whether or not to use digital forms of giving but maintaining the connection between the liturgical offertory and the tithes and offerings of the faithful. This is not simply a matter of how best to provide means for people to give but how to connect this giving to our own deep and profound Eucharistic theology." Good point.
Autonomous 12/19/7:46PM is obviously a TROLL.His "sizable weekly offering" is both rather doubtful and utterly worthless to God....due his obvious Trollness of spirit. Be careful, Troll... Jesus will tell many surprised goats (trolls?) at the Last Judgement, "Depart from Me...I never knew you."
Ex-Deacon Timothy Carter Kingsport, TN.

Anonymous said...

"I'd like to know why Heath Curtis, pastor of a tiny congregation in Illinois, became an expert on Christian stewardship."

Neither the size of the congregation to which a pastor is called, nor its location (can anything good come out of Worden, IL?) has any relation whatsoever to the theological acumen or wisdom of that pastor.

Further, he never advocated for the abolition of electronic giving, if you listen to the interview.

Besides this, Pastor Curtis is everything right with the LCMS. Let us thank God that such a faithful shepherd is in our ranks. In fact, it is a credit to his character that he serves a small congregation, when he is a theological heavyweight. I would recommend you read some of his work.

I would also humbly submit that you need to repent for your words against Prs. Curtis and Peters.

O Key of David come!