So also those who claim to be pro-choice are, in fact, decidedly against anyone's choice but their own, patently ignoring that they already made such a choice when deciding whether or not to engage in a, well, reproductive act. There is a choice that was made long before the need or want for a day after pill or some other means to abort the child already conceived. Now, some of you might think I am being callous toward those who are victims -- victims of rape or incest. The reality, agreed by all but hardly mentioned by those who are pro-choice, is that very few abortions are the done by those who are victims of rape or incest -- 1% due to rape and 1/2% due to incest. 98.5% are due to choice -- after a choice had already been made but was now regretted, perhaps solely because it was neither safe nor loving. But that is not my problem or the problem of the nation as a whole. We do not exist to give second chances to those who made a choice and then thought better of it --- precisely when that second chance for a choice comes at the cost of the life of another.
So much damage is done by the attempt to relieve those who have made a choice of the consequences of that choice. Abortion and no-fault divorce are but two of them. Consequences are what informs and shapes the decisions we make. It is precisely what happened in Eden. We ignore the consequences of our choices in order to focus on some presumed benefit -- only to find that the presumed benefit was not without its own cost. Wisdom is the fruit of the consideration of our choices and the consequences inherent within those choices. To relieve us of a consideration of those consequences, to offer us an out, is to deprive us of the very wisdom that God provides through those choices. Without the consequences, we are left prisoners of our desires and held captive by our whims. This is surely what we want but it is the most unhealthy thing that could happen to us -- a people tainted by a choice first made by those who refused to consider the consequences. Such are the lies behind the desire for reproductive rights that have nothing to do with reproduction and everything to do with preventing it or killing what has been born of the reproductive act or of a cause that is labeled pro-choice when it is really pro-do over -- give me a chance to redo what I did by eliminating not the act but its consequence. Such is the mark of how far we have fallen and how easy it is for us to justify just about anything to get what we want.
1 comment:
Reminds me of Dr. Nagel’s “unbelief is refusal of the gift.” So wanting to divorce the blessing of the physical pleasure from the blessing of the gift of a child. Saying “yes” to part of God’s gifts and “no” to the other part. It is fundamentally an attempt to remake reality on our own terms, and that never ends well.
Post a Comment