As we approach the season in which we recall and rejoice in our Lord's incarnation, it is precisely the written Word that shines light upon the stable and manger to know who was born there and what His birth means. The work of the angels sings in confession of that Word made flesh. The shepherds come to meet Him who is born, the Word in flesh. The Magi show up from Gentile origins to meet Him who in flesh fulfills the promise once given that through the offspring of Abraham shall all the nations of the world be blessed. The written word always directs us to its author -- the Word made flesh.
The Scriptures are either the cradle of Christ or they are words of nonsense and confusion. Christ is not ancillary to the Word but He is the key through which the darkness and veiled is enlightened and lifted. How odd it is, then, for those who think themselves servant of the Word either to encourage or demand a distance of the Christ from Scripture. It is clear that our Lord envisions no such distance. He opened the Scriptures on the Emmaus Road and to the apostles as He ascended by showing that they spoke of Him. Pay attention to that. The Word made flesh opened the written Word to show that they testify to Him.
The legacy of introducing such distance between the historical Jesus and the Christ of the Scriptures is to leave us with questions and doubts about who Jesus is and to wonder if we can ever answer that question. For those churches for whom Scripture is not the authority, it is perhaps a relief not to have to bother with the written Word and to invent a Christ aloof and distinct from -- even against -- the Word on the page. But for orthodox Christianity, the Word is how we know who Jesus is, what Jesus has done, and come to faith (by the Holy Spirit working through that Word). Put any distance between Christ and His Word and faith itself is rendered uncertain. The higher critics have placed such distance between Christ and His Word precisely so that the Word can be treated as any earthly book and its truth made subject to the reason and preferences of the moment. Only in this way can any justification be found for modernity and its support for everything from same sex marriage to the gender fluidity/identity curiosity that has captured the imagination of the liberal churches. Indeed, the outcome of distancing Christ from His Word is to turn the focus of that Word from Him and His salvation and onto us and our desires.
3 comments:
Lutheran Theology makes it appear that the Word of God acts on its own and has its own will. It is by water and “the word” we are baptized. Besides the Trinitarian Invocation, the Holy Spirit does not appear in the Small Catechism in the Article on Baptism. No mention is made of what St. Peter writes about Baptism, Acts 2:38, “…and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”
Apart from the Holy Spirit, the Word of God is empty and has no power. However the Word of God should not be confused with “the Word” in the beginning of the Gospel of John. There He is the Λόγος, which maybe should not be translated as “Word.”
St. Paul writes in Ephesians 6:17,”… and take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,…” Here “the word” is ῥῆμα, which is properly translated as “the word”, which is the tool of the Holy Spirit, commonly referred to as “the Word of God.”
Hermann Sasse writes, (On the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit, Letters to Lutheran Pastors, No. 51, July/August 1960, We Confess Anthology, P.27) “When the doctrine of the Person of the Holy Spirit is no longer rightly taught, there also the doctrine of the Person of Christ is no longer rightly understood.” The result is that the precious Gospel is also no longer rightly understood (This last sentence is not directed at you, Pastor Peters, because your writings show a remarkable understanding of the Gospel)
Peace and Joy!
George A. Marquart
"Lutheran Theology makes it appear that the Word of God acts on its own and has its own will. It is by water and “the word” we are baptized. Besides the Trinitarian Invocation, the Holy Spirit does not appear in the Small Catechism in the Article on Baptism. No mention is made of what St. Peter writes about Baptism, Acts 2:38, “…and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”
That simply is untrue! Aside from the Trinitarian Invocation, under Baptism in the Small Catechism:
Question #303 addresses your direct "Acts" point. Holy Spirit mentioned 6 times!
Page #292-3 Acts 2 portion mentioned twice.
Question #308 Holy Spirit cited in Acts again and Titus 3.
Question #309 Holy Spirit cited in 1 Cor.
Question #313 Holy Spirit cited in 1 Timothy.
The Power of Baptism (of Luther) Explanation and Titus 3 both cites Holy Spirit.
Question #316 Holy Spirit cited 5 times.
Question #318 Holy Spirit cited 9 times.
Question #320, #321 Holy Spirit cited once.
Dear Rev. Weinkauf: Thank you for your comment.
The Small Catechism I have (Concordia Publishing House 2011) does not show any of the questions you cite. There is a section on questions, but it does not have these questions. It shows paragraphs 239 to 260.
I was careless in writing that the Holy Spirit does not appear, I meant that “the indwelling of the Holy Spirit does not appear.” The Titus quote comes close, “He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out ON us generously through Jesus Christ our Savior …”
The indwelling of the Holy Spirit is mentioned most clearly by our Lord in John 14:17, “…even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, for he dwells with you and will be IN you.”
Peace and Joy!
George A. Marquart
Post a Comment