Dogmatically, the Roman Church has always considered the reception of Communion by the faithful as the logical and necessary conclusion of the sacrificial celebration. This was clearly the express will of Christ who invites to take and eat. Already St. John Chrysostom (349-407) complained, “In vain we stand before the altar, there is no one to partake.” Instruction had to take place to enjoin to the faithful the importance of receiving Communion. From the fourth century there were conciliar decrees obligating clerics to commune and in 1123 the First Lateran Council found it necessary to absolutely require confession and Communion at least once a year for all Catholics as an absolute minimum. This requirement, though it remains in force today it has seen widely diverging practice. A return to more frequent Communion, especially in the 19th and 20th centuries, restored the practice of more normal communion within the Mass.
My point here is not to focus on Rome's problems but to consider the situation Luther found in the Church at the time of the Reformation. If communion was not usual within the Mass, if the people had to be encouraged to commune at least once a year, and if it would take three to four hundred years after the Reformation before Rome was able to restore communion during the Mass as a norm, that says a great deal about the condition of the faithful at the time of Luther. It certainly explains Luther's own minimum of four times a year and makes Luther's minimum a much higher standard than the typical standard in place at the time. In this respect, Luther was ahead of his time and envisioned the norm that was typical of the early church and should have remained the standard for the church ever since.
Growing up in the Lutheranism of the 1950s I can see how a minimum of participation soon became the maximum number of times the Sacrament was even offered. It would take a couple of generations within the Lutheranism of my past before we learned to see Luther's words in context and move to engage more faithfully the norm of our own Confession and the standard of the Church from earliest times of a weekly Eucharist in which the faithful would have had a pretty big reason not to commune when the Eucharist was offered. In our Lutheran history, the Reformation which was also a time of sacramental renewal ended up getting lost in the swamps of Pietism, Rationalism, and non-sacramental Protestantism until it would take our own version of liturgical renewal to restore what Augustana said was our norm. More than this, however, is the continuing work of restoring the Sacrament as the beating heart of our piety. The easy part of restoring the frequency with which the Sacrament is offered is being done as I write. The more frequent communions that take place as a result of more frequent celebrations is also being done as I write. The restoration of the Eucharist to the center of our piety and the source and summit of our individual lives as well as our lives together continues to go on....
No comments:
Post a Comment