Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Dates and times estimated...

I am not sure what to make of this.  It is certainly interesting -- although it will not silence every critic or answer every question.  Someone emailed me the link before Easter but I never got to it.  Better late than never.  The author is some blogger called The Catholic Knight.  Take it or leave it but it is very interesting. I have posted the info here without further comment:

The subject of Jesus' crucifixion, particularly the date, is a sore one for some Christians, especially those of the Protestant Fundamentalist persuasion. The precise year of his crucifixion has been debated by scholars for centuries. Within the last 100 years, some groups have even called into question the day of his crucifixion, with a few groups insisting on Wednesday being the day of the event. If we go by the 'Bible Alone' without ever taking outside sources into consideration, one can see how this confusion might come about. However, all the clues we need for this little mystery are laid out for us plain to see, in black and white, just waiting for us to do our homework. The evidence is plentiful, once we're ready to start looking into what non-Biblical sources say about the astronomical events surrounding the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

Phlegon was a Greek historian who wrote an extensive chronology around AD 137:

In the fourth year of the 202nd Olympiad (i.e., AD 33) there was ‘the greatest eclipse of the sun’ and that ‘it became night in the sixth hour of the day [i.e., noon] so that stars even appeared in the heavens. There was a great earthquake in Bithynia, and many things were overturned in Nicaea.’
- Phlegon, 137 AD
Phlegon identifies the year and the exact time of day. In addition, he writes of an earthquake accompanying the darkness, which is specifically recorded in Matthew’s Gospel.

This event could not have been a solar eclipse in the classic sense. In other words, whatever caused a shadow to fall over the earth, and the sun's light to be blotted out, could not have been the moon. As the moon is always in the completely opposite position in the sky during the full moon phase, which is what Passover always falls on. Furthermore, solar eclipses just last a few minutes, never three hours. The three-hour "eclipse-like" event is a historical fact, and accounted for by non-biblical (even non-Christian) authors, including Pontius Pilate no less, who wrote in a report to Tiberius Caesar the following account...

Now when he was crucified darkness came over all the world; the sun was altogether hidden, and the sky appeared dark while it was yet day, so that the stars were seen, though still they had their luster obscured, wherefore, I suppose your excellency is not unaware that in all the world they lighted their lamps from the sixth hour until evening. And the moon, which was like blood, did not shine all night long, although it was at the full, and the stars and Orion made lamentation over the Jews because of the transgression committed by them.
- Pontius Pilate, 33 AD
We may never know what caused the solar eclipse-like event that lasted three hours, but we can speculate. Assuming that God uses natural events in unexpected ways to accomplish most of his miracles, then using what we know about natural phenomena, we can make a good guess. Eclipses are caused when the shadow of something is cast on the earth. Under normal circumstances, its the shadow of the moon cast upon the earth, as the moon passes between the earth and the sun, blotting out the sun's light for a few minutes. So based on what we know causes eclipses, we can speculate that something fairly large passed between the earth and the sun on the date and time in question, and we know that it could not have been the moon. Also the duration of the event (3 hours) would seem to indicate that the trajectory of the object was such that it kept the shadow on relatively the same place (the Mediterranean world) for about three hours. One possibility would be a very large asteroid (or even planetoid) on a near collision course with the earth. If the trajectory were so that the large celestial object (several dozen miles in diameter at least) were coming directly from the angle of the sun, passing by the earth at an incredibly close range, it might create a shadow large enough to eclipse the sun wherever it was cast on the earth's surface. Furthermore, such a near miss with such a large object would certainly capture the object in the earth's gravitational well, causing the object to be flung around the earth at a totally different trajectory then when it came in. If the object were to have it's own gravitational pull, and something that size probably would, then it might have caused disturbances on the earth as it passed by in the form of natural disasters, such as earthquakes for example. Granted this is all just speculation, but I am unaware of any other natural occurrence that could cause an eclipse-like event lasting three hours, coupled with earthquakes, like the one described by so many sources from antiquity. I should like to see more study into this possibility done by people more well versed in astronomy and astrophysics than myself.

If indeed I am right about the darkness being caused by a celestial object (asteroid or planetoid) then we have to ask ourselves what this means not just scientifically but religiously too.  Such an object, had it made contact with the earth, would have created nothing short of an extinction event.  This might not just be of mankind, but of all animal and plant life itself.  The impact would have burst the whole world into flames.  Nothing would survive.  The molten slag that was once earth would have taken hundreds of years to cool, and nothing larger than a microbe would exist on earth today, if even that.  Jesus Christ came to save mankind from this sort of judgement, and prepare for us instead a path to eternal life.  Could the shadow cast by this speculative celestial object shed new insight on the words of our Saviour: "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me!?!" Could it have appeared to the Messiah that judgement was coming upon the earth in spite of his sacrifice?  I don't know the answer to this question, as I cannot know the mind of Christ, nor can I know exactly what happened that remarkable day.  What I do know is this.  Whatever God did to cast a shadow on the whole earth (or just a large part of it) must have been incredibly threatening to the planet, and judging by the earthquakes that followed, I would say the earth (and humanity) narrowly missed our judgement day.

The occurrence of a blood red moon is actually much more easy to explain. Pilate's account to the red moon also helps us confirm not only the year, but the actual day. NASA has already accounted for the only kind of eclipse that can happen in a full moon phase, which is a lunar eclipse, frequently known to give the moon a "blood red" appearance, particularly when they are seen only partially. NASA pinpoints this event to April 3rd, 33 AD. The following chart is their report, which can be viewed on NASA's actual website here...

Finally, we must look to the Jewish calender to verify that a Passover did occur on this date. Indeed it did. Nissan 15, the customary day for Passover, would have fallen on Saturday the 4th of April in 33 AD. That would have made this particular Saturday a "high sabbath" which is mentioned in the gospel accounts, and it would have made Friday the 3rd of April the day of preparation, when the lamb sacrifice was slaughtered in the Temple. This would have put Jesus crucifixion at exactly the time when the Passover lambs were being slaughtered, just hours before sunset, when Nissan 15 began on the Jewish calendar. (Remember, the Jewish calendar begins each day at sundown not midnight.) Typically, the Passover meal would have been eaten that Friday evening in 33 AD. However, the gospels tell us that Jesus ate the Passover with his disciples the night before -- Thursday. This may be accounted for by the probability that Jesus was using the Essene calendar for the calculation of Passover (read more here).

Pope Benedict XVI, in his Holy Thursday homily for 2007 pointed out that Jesus; "celebrated Passover with his disciples probably according to the calendar of Qumran, that is to say, at least one day earlier -- he celebrated without a lamb, like the Qumran community who did not recognize the Temple of Herod and was waiting for a new temple."

So there you have it folks. The definitive date of Jesus' crucifixion is settled by two undeniable astronomical events. The first extraordinary, recorded in the gospels, and confirmed by the written testimony of non-Biblical authors. The second quite ordinary and predictable, easily calculated and illustrated by the experts at NASA. Finally, we have the confirmation of the Jewish calendar, which confirms a Passover preparation on this very day, just as the gospels tell us. Jesus Christ was crucified at high noon, and died at 3 pm, on April 3rd, 33 AD.


Rev. Matt said...

Well, he's really reaching

The letter of Pontius Pilate is generally considered to be pseudepigraphal and with the number of changes to both the Hebrew calendar and the Western calendar (neither of which even existed in their modern from in the 1st century ad) it is impossible to place any date on a specific day of the week accurately.

Most telling, however, is that the Pharisees would have been defiled and unable to eat the feast had they entered Pialte's house. This would not have applied to the Passover feast as it began after sundown and the period of defilement would have been over. It would, however, be correct for the feast of the 2nd day of Passover week which was eaten during the day.

If Christ's death occurred at 3:00 on the afternoon following the Passover email, then, at the moment of Christ's death, the lamb of the evening sacrifice would be lying dead (having been slain at 2:30) in preparation for being put on the altar (at 3:30)

Christ's death, the earth quake and the tearing of the curtain would have happened during the evening service of sacrifice within an hour or so of the offering of incense and the time of prayer. While that service was being conducted individual sacrifices in the temple would be stopped. The earthquake and tearing of the curtain would all have happened during the evening sacrifice. (kind of interesting when you compare to Rev. 5-8 where the lamb appears in the midst of the elders looking as if He has been slain and, on the opening of the last seal there is silence in heaven, the prayers of the saint and an earthquake)

So we begin the Gospel account with the announcement of the pending birth of John the baptist during the offering of the morning incense at the morning sacrifice and Christ dies while the lamb lies dead in preparation for the evening sacrifice and not long prior to the offering of the incense at evening prayer)

Rev. Matt said...

ack - how did i type email for meal? Guess Christ was way ahead of his time. I doubt he delivered his Passover discourse electronically.

Rev. Matt said...

It should also be noted, by the way, that the passover lamb was not considered a sin offering or a guilt offering and there would have been no real significance to Christ dying while the passover lambs were offered (which, by the way, actually would have started at 1:30 if passover fell on a Friday and gone on for several hours). However, the lamb of the evening sacrifice WAS considered a sin offering.

The significance of the passover lamb was not that it was a sin offering but that it formed part of the meal......hmmmm.....like Christ is present in Communion maybe? The significance of Christ, the passover Lamb, forming the meal of communion is lost if the passover lambs were killed on Friday rather than Thursday (prior to the last supper).

Janis Williams said...

Fr. Peters,

Paul Maier recently mentioned Phlegon in explaining th darkness of crucifixion day. Of course, he didn't go to the extent this man did.

It is interesting, however when the ancient historians (and hostile witnesses) tend to confirm Truth.

I don't want a natural explanation of miraculous events, but when history tends to confirm that they took place, then, I'll take it.

Chris said...

Actually, it would have been March 23 according to the Julian Calendar which is proclaimed in the Synaxarion of the Orthodox Churches on every Great and Holy Friday.