For those who question the antiquity of hymn singing (given that hymn is a word that does not refer to something which is stagnant but a form always in process), let me refer you to a quote from Augustine (kindly provided by a reader of this blog):
"The church of Milan had only recently begun to employ this mode of
consolation and exaltation with all the brethren singing together with
great earnestness of voice and heart. For it was only about a year --
not much more -- since Justina, the mother of the boy-emperor
Valentinian, had persecuted thy servant Ambrose on behalf of her heresy,
in which she had been seduced by the Arians. The devoted people kept
guard in the church, prepared to die with their bishop, thy servant.
Among them my mother, thy handmaid, taking a leading part in those
anxieties and vigils, lived there in prayer. And even though we were
still not wholly melted by the heat of thy Spirit, we were nevertheless
excited by the alarmed and disturbed city.
This was the time that the custom began, after the manner of the
Eastern Church, that hymns and psalms should be sung, so that the people
would not be worn out with the tedium of lamentation. This custom,
retained from then till now, has been imitated by many, indeed, by
almost all thy congregations throughout the rest of the world." St. Augustine, Confessions
4 comments:
Augustine is not advocating for congregational singing here. That is a recent innovation.
Whether or not Augustine was advocating for this is completely irrelevant. The practice of hymn singing predates the third century. The Church of Milan has begun... with all the brethren singing... you may not like it but this takes away all doubt that hymns in the liturgy and hymn singing is merely a recent innovation.
But I'm sure that what Pr. Peters is doing is trying to equate hymn singing with congregational singing. And that has never been the approach of the Eastern or western church. That is a recent innovation.
Is there some argument against congregational singing?
Post a Comment