Apparently, a 1969 German radio broadcast recorded then Father Joseph Ratzinger as he offered some careful thoughts on the question, “What will become of the Church in the future?” He ended with the following paragraphs:
“The future of the Church can and will issue from those whose roots are deep and who live from the pure fullness of their faith. It will not issue from those who accommodate themselves merely to the passing moment or from those who merely criticize others and assume that they themselves are infallible measuring rods; nor will it issue from those who take the easier road, who sidestep the passion of faith, declaring false and obsolete, tyrannous and legalistic, all that makes demands upon men, that hurts them and compels them to sacrifice themselves. To put this more positively: The future of the Church, once again as always, will be reshaped by saints, by men, that is, whose minds probe deeper than the slogans of the day, who see more than others see, because their lives embrace a wider reality. Unselfishness, which makes men free, is attained only through the patience of small daily acts of self-denial. By this daily passion, which alone reveals to a man in how many ways he is enslaved by his own ego, by this daily passion and by it alone, a man’s eyes are slowly opened. He sees only to the extent that he has lived and suffered. If today we are scarcely able any longer to become aware of God, that is because we find it so easy to evade ourselves, to flee from the depths of our being by means of the narcotic of some pleasure or other. Thus our own interior depths remain closed to us. If it is true that a man can see only with his heart, then how blind we are!
How does all this affect the problem we are examining? It means that the big talk of those who prophesy a Church without God and without faith is all empty chatter. We have no need of a Church that celebrates the cult of action in political prayers. It is utterly superfluous. Therefore, it will destroy itself. What will remain is the Church of Jesus Christ, the Church that believes in the God who has become man and promises us life beyond death. The kind of priest who is no more than a social worker can be replaced by the psychotherapist and other specialists; but the priest who is no specialist, who does not stand on the [sidelines], watching the game, giving official advice, but in the name of God places himself at the disposal of man, who is beside them in their sorrows, in their joys, in their hope and in their fear, such a priest will certainly be needed in the future.
Let us go a step farther. From the crisis of today the Church of tomorrow will emerge — a Church that has lost much. She will become small and will have to start afresh more or less from the beginning. She will no longer be able to inhabit many of the edifices she built in prosperity. As the number of her adherents diminishes, so it will lose many of her social privileges. In contrast to an earlier age, it will be seen much more as a voluntary society, entered only by free decision. As a small society, it will make much bigger demands on the initiative of her individual members. Undoubtedly it will discover new forms of ministry and will ordain to the priesthood approved Christians who pursue some profession. In many smaller congregations or in self-contained social groups, pastoral care will normally be provided in this fashion. Along-side this, the full-time ministry of the priesthood will be indispensable as formerly. But in all of the changes at which one might guess, the Church will find her essence afresh and with full conviction in that which was always at her center: faith in the triune God, in Jesus Christ, the Son of God made man, in the presence of the Spirit until the end of the world. In faith and prayer she will again recognize the sacraments as the worship of God and not as a subject for liturgical scholarship.
The Church will be a more spiritual Church, not presuming upon a political mandate, flirting as little with the Left as with the Right. It will be hard going for the Church, for the process of crystallization and clarification will cost her much valuable energy. It will make her poor and cause her to become the Church of the meek. The process will be all the more arduous, for sectarian narrow-mindedness as well as pompous self-will will have to be shed. One may predict that all of this will take time. The process will be long and wearisome as was the road from the false progressivism on the eve of the French Revolution — when a bishop might be thought smart if he made fun of dogmas and even insinuated that the existence of God was by no means certain — to the renewal of the nineteenth century. But when the trial of this sifting is past, a great power will flow from a more spiritualized and simplified Church. Men in a totally planned world will find themselves unspeakably lonely. If they have completely lost sight of God, they will feel the whole horror of their poverty. Then they will discover the little flock of believers as something wholly new. They will discover it as a hope that is meant for them, an answer for which they have always been searching in secret.
And so it seems certain to me that the Church is facing very hard times. The real crisis has scarcely begun. We will have to count on terrific upheavals. But I am equally certain about what will remain at the end: not the Church of the political cult, which is dead already, but the Church of faith. It may well no longer be the dominant social power to the extent that she was until recently; but it will enjoy a fresh blossoming and be seen as man’s home, where he will find life and hope beyond death.
The Catholic Church will survive in spite of men and women, not necessarily because of them. And yet, we still have our part to do. We must pray for and cultivate unselfishness, self-denial, faithfulness, Sacramental devotion and a life centered on Christ."Regardless of whether or not you are Roman Catholic, his words are rather prescient for being some 50 years old and he seems to have found a glimpse into the future, though I am not sure he ever thought that would have included him as Pope Benedict XVI. In any case, I post his words simply for you to consider and comment upon.
In other words, quality not quantity.
There is no question regarding the church of the future, for Jesus clearly spells this out in the Word. The Book of Revelation gives a very clear picture of the church of the future. It's all good, for the victory has been assured.
Ratzinger was a great theologian who had a great respect for scripture, and made great efforts to reconcile tradition with scripture. He garnered great respect from our Lutheran theologians when he was pope and we when we were in dialogue with Roman Catholics.
It is a sad day indeed when he resigned as pope, because the RC church has been in regression every since.
There is no need to reconcile tradition and Scripture. They are not opponents. And Ratzinger saw no conflict there so I'm not sure how you make the conclusion you do.
The Christian Church has always needed Christians who are deeply
committed to Jesus Christ and make him a daily priority. We need
to study and meditate on Holy Scripture to build a strong basis
for our spiritual life. Built on the foundation of God's Word the
church cannot fail.
Cliff, thank you for that comment but I am in agreement with Chris. Since Scripture and Tradition go hand in hand, there is no need to reconcile the two since they complement each other.
Dan, & Chris, I think you are both taking the Lutheran position, which in that case you are correct. However, Roman Catholics placed an extraordinarily emphasis on tradition and at one time not too long ago (pre-Vatican II) scripture was not equivalent to tradition.
I do agree that Ratzinger had no trouble reconciling the two. He was a good theologian, unlike the current pope who is a theological lightweight.
NO, he doesn't reconcile the two because, and this has always been the case, there is nothing to reconcile. The Church stands on Scripture AND Tradition. They complement, not contradict, each other and that was so until Luther posted his 95 theses and then Tradition was seen as a bad thing. If they contradicted each other then you would be correct in saying that B16 was trying to reconcile the two.
You are thoroughly correct about this current pope hands down.
The mileage of Tiber- and Bosporus-waders may vary.
Post a Comment