Tuesday, January 30, 2018
An immersive video experience. . .
Apparently an arson attack on a Lutheran congregation in the state of Washington destroyed the building and its AVL (audio, video, and lighting) set up. In rebuilding, they were able to obtain an even more immersive audio video experience than ever before. While the article did not really tell me much, the photos did. The congregation uses its walls as screens and blankets the walls with video projection from no less than four HD projectors.
The photos showed the altar and pulpit with a video background that looked like stone walls and stained glass windows and then with the landscape of the city at night (buildings and landscape all lit up). My assumption here is that the congregation can literally paint whatever landscape it wants across the walls. Such is the power of the technology available that it is no longer limited to screens. In fact, judging by the photos in the article, the images are painted from floor to ceiling and from one end of the building to another.
The article was really selling the brand of projector but in doing so it gave me pause to think about how this power to image literally anything could be used for ill just as much as it might be used for good. Underneath it all is this somewhat sobering assumption. The bottom line is that there is no permanent image in this congregation's worship space -- only the blank canvas. In addition, without any permanent imagery, the faith itself somewhat takes on the same temporary character as the images which are projected upon the blank walls. In other words, there is nothing there at all until something is projected upon it. It is the ultimate virtual church. I am uneasy about this and about the implications to both the church and those who worship there.
The whole idea of a church building is to give shape and form to the faith confessed. Integral to that faith and form is the idea of permanence. While no one expects things built of stone or brick or wood or steel to be eternal, neither should we assume that these things are temporary -- at least not as temporary as a projected image!
The other temptation is to be creative. Without limit or boundary to what can be done, what should not be done is as tempting as what ought to be done. That is a simple truth that surely cannot be denied in this circumstance as well. I am not, by the way, impugning the integrity of the pastors or staff of this congregation. I am assuming that creativity can often lead to presumption and that just because we can, we ought to do it. I believe there is even something Biblical in that thought. What is possible is not always what is beneficial. Even under the best of circumstances restraint would have to be the keyword for such technology. The church at worship is not an entertainment experience and the technology to create whatever we will is often at odds with the focus upon the Word of the Lord that endures forever.
Maybe I am just an old curmudgeon who thinks too much. . . or maybe not.