Friday, February 10, 2012
That women will get to wear the mitre is in little doubt.
(Reuters) - The Church of England moved closer to the consecration of women bishops Wednesday when it voted against giving strengthened legal protection to traditionalists who favour an all-male clergy, a decision that could lead more to switch to Rome.
The vote was the last chance for the church's parliament, or synod, to influence the draft legislation in its long legislative process before it heads to the House of Bishops for consideration in May. The draft will return to synod in July for a final vote - 20 years after it voted in favour of women priests.
That women will get to wear the mitre is in little doubt. What the synod had to consider was how much extra provision traditionalist Anglo-Catholics and conservative evangelicals would get and how much more authority liberals should cede.
The consecration of women, along with homosexual bishops and same-sex marriages, is among the most divisive issues facing the 77 million members of the Anglican Church round the world. Other Anglican provinces already have women bishops, including the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Traditionalists and evangelicals, who say they represent 1,000 of the 13,000 parishes in England and Wales, wanted to strengthen the legal position of male bishops ministering in dioceses where parishes objected to women bishops.
They backed a motion which in effect resurrected a proposal put forward by the two most senior Church of England clerics, the archbishops of Canterbury and York, in July 2010, but which was rejected by the synod at the time. It would have provided for a so-called nominated bishop, working alongside the female bishop under a system of a co-ordinated, or shared, jurisdiction, drawing his authority from the church rather than diocesan bishop. Traditionalists argue that as Jesus Christ's apostles were all men, there is nothing in the Bible or church history to support women bishops. Had the synod voted for their proposal, it could have held up the legislative process by a year. As it is, traditionalists have asked the House of Bishops to "provide properly for those unable in conscience to accept the oversight of women bishops." Liberals argued they had made enough concessions already, and any further compromise would create "second-tier" women bishops.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
So now the queen can be the head of the anglican church. Heretofore only kings could be.
"a decision that could lead more to switch to Rome."
Why is it automatically assumed that disaffected Anglicans will convert to Roman Catholicism?
Many other denominations would live to have these people.
Who cares what the Church of England does? It has been a heterodox body since Day One. If they veer from their own confession, that is too bad for them, but nothing to us.
Women stopped wearing hats in the
Post a Comment